laitimes

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

"It's a 90-minute game, how much is it worth? With so many staff and fans coming from both teams, I want to ask what is the value of this game? I know how to win SIPG, just score in 95 minutes, but I can't. Sorry, I won't accept questions today. ”

After saying these words and leaving directly, Cui Kangxi made his attitude clear!

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

It is clear that Choi Kang-hee's dissatisfaction stems from the goal that was blown off. After the controversial penalty appeared, the current referee Wang Zhe and SIPG, who have benefited from the controversial penalty many times this season, have been put on the cusp; The famous media person Yuan Jia even made it clear in the live broadcast that SIPG was taken care of by the judges!

Fellaini's blown goal is disputed in three ways:

1. Fellaini and Zhang Linpeng have movements on their hands, whether they should blow fouls;

2. Whether Jiang Guangtai's solution is considered a ball conversion;

3. If the referee did not blow a foul in the first blow, should VAR intervene;

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

These three questions, the rules can give us the answers.

1. Although Fellaini and Zhang Linpeng have movements on their hands, Fellaini had excessive force when he knocked Zhang Linpeng down, and Fellaini was blown to foul no problem.

2. In the rules, regarding "ball control", it is mentioned that two situations are not considered "obvious ball control"; One is that the save, refraction or rebound situation does not form possession, and the other is that it is not touched or controlled by the same team member after the clearance. Jiang Guangtai's relief was not touched or controlled by other players in SIPG, so strictly according to the rules, there was no problem of ball conversion.

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

3. The competition rules stipulate that all "direct red cards", "penalties" and "goals" will be confirmed by VAR in the background; If VAR finds an "error" in the on-duty referee during the confirmation process, they will remind it in the headset; Generally, in addition to offside, whether other penalties should be judged, the on-duty referee will come to the sidelines to watch the game in person.

Fellaini fouled, the ball was not converted, VAR reminded the referee that there was no problem in these three links, which seemed to constitute the basis for the referee's decision! But Wang Zhe's "change of sentence", in essence, is to use a mistake to make up for the previous mistake!

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

When Fellaini knocked Zhang Linpeng down, Wang Zhe had already noticed; If he had blown the whistle in time for the first time, the foul would not have been talked about after the game.

But after Wang Zhe saw it, he did not blow the game, which can be interpreted as the moment when Fellaini knocked down Zhang Linpeng, Wang Zhe thought there was no foul!

If Wang Zhe believes there was no foul, it means that Fellaini's subsequent header will be no problem.

And in the end, I watched VAR cancel the goal, and it was Wang Zhe who used the mistake of "finding balance" to make up for "the mistake that he didn't blow a foul in the first time".

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

And for the rest of the game, Wang Zhe can be said to be constantly trying to find balance; However, the level of law enforcement of Chinese referees determines that when referees constantly find balance in order to make up for mistakes, often this game will blow both sides dissatisfied!

Considering that Taishan played Shenhua away in the first round of the season, Cui Lin's obvious handball game in the penalty area was blown by Wang Zhe, and it can be said that Wang Zhe is very "defeated" by the Taishan team. However, not many people cared about the grudge between Wang Zhe and the Taishan team, and more pointed their guns at SIPG. Not only fans, but also many media people are also openly bringing the rhythm of "escorting to Hong Kong"; On the web, someone has already listed multiple games that SIPG has been taken care of this season! But in fact, some of the so-called "evidence" listed is itself full of loopholes.

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

For example, playing Qingdao Manatee, many people who have not watched the ball have been saying that "Oscar instigated the offside return before the goal"; But when some fans filmed Paulinho Jr. giving the ball to Oscar, in addition to the Qingdao goalkeeper, there was a defensive player, which was closer to the bottom line than Oscar.

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

For example, when Zhong Yihao put a tackle in the penalty area, the ball did not reach and knocked people down, isn't this a penalty?

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

SIPG played two penalties from Nantong Zhiyun, one was Oscar's goal, and the defender raised his hand in front of him in the box; The other Wu Lei touched the ball first before the other party solved the siege, and Ye Lijiang moved slowly and put Wu Lei down; Aren't these two penalties?

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?
Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

Another example is that the "body hair offside" of hitting national security was blown out; That ball was personally drawn by many professionals, and the Guoan players were a little bit ahead; Is "body hair offside" not offside?

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

In a real sense, there are only two mistakes and omissions that have obviously profited from SIPG this season - one is playing Shenhua, the unwarranted corner kick before Wu Lei scored; The other was a goal that was blown away by Beric. As for Fellaini's blown goal, it was Wang Zhe's poor business ability that wronged the Taishan team; You can think that he intended to target the Tarzans, but that doesn't constitute evidence that he wants to protect SIPG. If he really wanted to protect Shanggang, obviously saw Fellaini knocking Zhang Linpeng down, why didn't he blow a foul at the first time?

In fact, every team has times when it suffers, and every team also has times when it takes advantage! However, in Chinese football, because of the "particularity" of SIPG, many things for them will be magnified.

In the two years of playing in Shanghai East Asia, because Xu was scolded for a whole game at the Sailing Stadium, as well as "competition in the same city" and "Cao Yunding public diss Wulei", their fans formed a bond with Henan fans and Shenhua fans. After Shanghai Port came in, the relationship between Shanghai Port and Henan has been significantly eased; But before the Evergrande thunderstorm, because the two have long been each other's biggest competitors, and the two management themselves are not very easy to deal with, Evergrande SIPG can be said to be each other's number one mortal enemy. And Guoan and Taishan are also because of the competition, and it is definitely not a brotherhood club to follow Hong Kong.

In Chinese football, the largest fan base is Guoan, Shenhua, Evergrande, and Taishan! The fan base of any of these 4 families is far better than that of SIPG. Among them, many fans of Evergrande and Shenhua have colored glasses for SIPG itself. And Taishan and Guoan in the game of SIPG, once they suffer a loss in the dispute, their fans will also join the crusade against SIPG in those days.

Of course, the voice of the fans is easily swayed by the direction of public opinion, and the direction of public opinion is largely in the hands of the media, or some big V; However, SIPG is the club that attaches the most importance to party building in the Chinese Super League and one of the clubs that attaches the least importance to the media.

Repeatedly controversial punishment beneficiaries, standing on the opposite side of public opinion, has SIPG been guaranteed by the Football Association?

During the Golden Yuan period, at least half of the clubs in the Chinese Super League signed agreements with professional newspapers; And this agreement is simply summarized as the club pays for it, and professional newspapers act as a "protective umbrella" + provide "thug services" on public opinion propaganda! And SIPG received the agreement of the professional newspaper very early, but perhaps because it was too close to the local eastern body, SIPG was indifferent to the agreement of the professional newspaper.

When SIPG's competitors had already signed an agreement, SIPG always refused, which led to the continuous attacks of SIPG and related personnel in the past few years.

For other media practitioners, SIPG's attitude is also the same; In the Golden Yuan football period, compared to most clubs' reporters running away, they would be stuffed with an envelope + solve the ticket hotel; SIPG once gave very good "care" to a very small number of media, but for other media, it can be called a dime; This has led to some untaken media (even some local Shanghai media) also standing against them early!

When a club with a fan base far inferior to its mortal rival is on the opposite side of many media; This has led to the fact that the public opinion wind they have faced over the years has always been very bad, which not only causes all their operations to be amplified; Even when Chen Jiayuan first went to the Football Association, many people in the football circle and football media circles privately said that Lao Chen "came from a bad background"!

However, during Chen Jiayuan's tenure, SIPG, which was taken care of every day in the eyes of public opinion, achieved nothing for 4 years, and twice refreshed and equaled the worst league ranking of SIPG after entering Chinese football! Nowadays, in the eyes of many people, the "umbrella" of SIPG, Chen Jiayuan has entered, former East Asia coach Gao Hongbo has little intersection with the current SIPG management, and the national brand has already made Gao Guild's head anxious, this year he did not manage the league at all, nor did he care about referees and disciplinary punishments! And Song Kai and others, who parachuted into the work of the Football Association, could not fight with Hong Kong; Does the Football Association still have an "umbrella" for SIPG? Will SIPG really be escorted?

Read on