laitimes

Closed beta application: iFLYTEK Spark won? Baidu Wenxin moves forward slowly?

author:Colorful on black and white keys

Recently, the internal test application incident of Wen Xin's words and iFLYTEK Xinghuo has attracted widespread attention. Many users complain that Baidu's application process is slow, and they even have to wait more than a month to pass the application.

In contrast, iFLYTEK Xinghuo's internal beta application was quickly approved, and an account was available within an hour. This phenomenon has caused some users' doubts and dissatisfaction, and also makes us think: Is it not possible to eat grapes and say grape sour, or is it other reasons that cause this phenomenon?

Closed beta application: iFLYTEK Spark won? Baidu Wenxin moves forward slowly?

First of all, we cannot deny the efficiency of iFLYTEK Spark in the internal beta application. Compared with Baidu's Wen Xin, iFLYTEK Xinghuo's internal test application is indeed much faster. This may be related to the user base, brand awareness, and importance of users by iFLYTEK Spark. After all, as an emerging language model, iFLYTEK Xinghuo needs to collect user feedback through internal testing and continuously improve and optimize its own performance. Therefore, quickly obtaining a closed beta account is very important for iFLYTEK Xinghuo.

However, we cannot completely deny Baidu's Wen Xin statement. Although the application process is relatively slow, Baidu, as a leading Internet company in China, has strong technical strength and resource advantages. In the field of language models, Baidu also has rich experience and technology accumulation. Therefore, we have reason to believe that Baidu's Wen Xin Yiyan will continue to improve and improve in the future to bring users a better experience.

Closed beta application: iFLYTEK Spark won? Baidu Wenxin moves forward slowly?

In addition, we also need to realize that the mentality of "can't eat grapes and say grape sour" is not advisable. Whether it is Baidu's Wenxin Yiyan or iFLYTEK Spark, they are excellent language models with certain advantages and disadvantages. We should evaluate their performance and performance in an objective and rational manner, rather than just dissatisfaction and complaints because we have not qualified for the internal test.

Finally, we should also thank those friends who helped us apply for a beta account. In this process, their support and help are undoubtedly an important factor in our successful qualification for the closed beta. At the same time, it also reminds us that in the age of social networks, helping and sharing with each other has become an important force. Only by working together can we better promote the progress and development of artificial intelligence technology.

In short, whether it is Baidu's Wenxin or iFLYTEK Xinghuo, they are language models with certain advantages and characteristics in different fields.

Finally, with the help of friends, I applied for a 360 brain map, which is waiting for review.

At present, I have experienced ChatGPT, iFLYTEK Spark,

There are still some gaps between iFLYTEK and chatGPT's understanding ability, but it is already very good, and it may be able to surpass chatGPT in the near future, because it is more in line with a language environment of our people. He is a language model trained by our countrymen and understands us better.

#Wen Xin Yiyan##iFLYTEK Spark##360 Wisdom Brain#

Closed beta application: iFLYTEK Spark won? Baidu Wenxin moves forward slowly?

Read on