On February 22, 2010, a scientist on the mainland declared to the whole country: "The danger of eating genetically modified rice is no greater than drinking water." "The speaker is Academician Zhang Qiqi of the Academy of Engineering.
Including the "Farmer's Daily" that came out as a GMO staple food platform some time ago, under the premise that no complete experimental data has been publicly released for so many years, why can experts swear that GM is good and GM food security? Don't worry, let's take a look at this company's resume first.
According to public information, he is not only an academician of the Continental Academy of Engineering, but also a foreign academician of the American Academy of Sciences, "a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Rockefeller Foundation Rice Biotechnology International Cooperation Program", "a member of the Expert Committee of the McKnight Foundation Botanical International Cooperation Program", and "Director of the Monsanto Scholarship Evaluation Committee"...
Monsanto is the inventor of the world's most evil company – polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), DDT, Agent Orange, and GMOs. The U.S. soldiers took the food war in Argentina and Brazil without bloodshed, and Monsanto contributed a lot. It is precisely because of Monsanto's propaganda and the active lobbying of local spokesmen in Brazil and Argentina that GM food has been commercialized on a large scale in both countries, resulting in its domestic food security eventually falling under the control of the United States. Ultimately, the technology therefore did no good for increased production and environmental security, and it was also boycotted by more than 400 regions in more than 60 countries around the world, eventually going bankrupt. Although it was acquired by Bayer, its legacy still seems to be "carried forward".
The Rockefeller Foundation, by contrast, is a behemoth, as the Los Angeles Times points out, "'philanthropic' foundations earn huge returns each year from their profitable investments that actually conflict with their high-sounding 'social good activities'", "claiming to bring benefits to the poor on the one hand, but hurting them on the other", and "the most frightening thing is that the foundation's investments are solely for profit, regardless of the consequences".
Every time they go to a country, in order to package its spokesperson and control the country's discourse, they can say that they can do everything they can. If you want money to give money, if you want the number of papers, you will give you the green light in well-known journals, and when you receive both fame and fortune, you still can't climb up? When you go up, what should I do?
I wonder what doorway you can see? Sadly, academicians and experts with a background in the United States and inextricably linked to relevant foundations and large companies in the United States are far more than him in China. Any formulation of relevant policies needs to refer to the opinions and suggestions of these experts, including the direction of scientific research and the flow of funds every year...
Write at the end and ask the expert a few questions
I am a self-media person "far away from the rivers and lakes", a commentator on current affairs;
If you like my show, welcome to follow and forward, you can also leave a comment below!
Thank you!
More good articles, click my avatar to view!
Disclaimer: The views in the article only represent the author, if you have different opinions, you are welcome to criticize and correct. Follow me and update original articles every day.