Some couples divorced are enemies, some couples divorce do not say bad things to each other, a divorced person said: Even if I scold my ex as scum, it seems that I am very capable?
Situations like "peaceful breakups" apply in many fields, but not necessarily in the Deyun Society in the crosstalk industry.
Yan Zonghai (formerly known as Yan Yunda), a former employee of Deyun Society and Guo Degang's former apprentice, suddenly went angry on social platforms, targeting Zhang Heqing, that is, Zhang Fan, and by the way, he also carried Guo Degang.
The reason is not complicated, Zhang Heqing contemplated Yan Zonghai as a "traitor" in the crosstalk with Yan Zonghai's former partner Liu Zhe, which caused Yan Zonghai's dissatisfaction.
Of course, there are also fans who defend Zhang Heqing, saying that his line is "hope disciple", Guo Degang's expectant apprentice. I just don't know who can believe this explanation.
In the author's opinion, this is a small matter, but it highlights a serious problem in the Deyun Society, and this problem has a long history and has affected the image of the Deyun Society, which is the master-apprentice relationship.
First, Yan Zonghai's anger
Traitor, which refers to a person who has betrayed an act, is a word often mentioned during war years, but in the Deyun Society in peacetime, traitor can actually become a common word.
Traitors in the Deyun Society rice circle have a narrow and broad sense.
A traitor in a broad sense refers to all those who voluntarily leave Deyun Society, typically such as Xu Deliang, who chose to leave voluntarily because he could not earn the income he hoped for in Beijing Deyun Society Culture Co., Ltd., and was actually defined as a traitor by the rice circle.
If according to the definition of traitor in the Deyun community rice circle, then the country's less than hundreds of millions or more than a billion people may have been "traitors" once, twice or even more, after all, some people can jump jobs many times in their lives, as long as they are actively job-hopping, they can be classified as "traitors" in the cognitive system of the Deyun community rice circle, you say terrible is not terrible.
Traitors in the narrow sense refer to some people who have become antithesis of Deyun Society or Guo Degang after leaving Deyun Society, especially Guo Degang's apprentices.
The problem is, Yan Zonghai did not become the opposite of Deyun Society and Guo Degang after leaving Deyun Society, how did he also become a "traitor"?
Therefore, whether in a broad or narrow sense, Zhang Heqing's connotation that Yan Zonghai is a "traitor" is a very unreasonable and irrational behavior, and Yan Zonghai's anger is certainly understandable.
Second, the distortion of the dual-track system
Yan Zonghai's problem is solved, some people will definitely say that he is not a traitor, so are He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin considered traitors?
Of course, it can't be counted, one of the reasons is similar to Yan Zonghai, He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin did not take the initiative to attack Deyun Society or Guo Degang after they quit Deyun Society, the so-called calling master all happened after Deyun Society announced the family tree and expelled He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin Shimen, and the order in time cannot be chaotic.
Just like Yan Zonghai this time, he has never taken the initiative to attack Deyun Society and Guo Degang, Zhang Heqing, as Guo Degang's apprentice and Deyun Society employee, took the initiative to connote Yan Zonghai, is it not allowed Yan Zonghai to fight back? Deyun Society openly scolded the former apprentice on the family tree for cheating and destroying the ancestor, and did not allow the apprentice to fight back?
Yang Zhigang said in the newspaper in 2006 that Guo Degang had encroached on state property that year, and Guo Degang immediately posted a blog to fight back.
In this matter, Guo Degang, He Yunwei, Cao Yunjin, and Yan Zonghai's practices all have understandable sides, and they cannot be denied altogether.
The main reason why He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin are not traitors is the dual-track system of Deyun Society in handling the master-apprentice relationship, and many of the sources of disputes in the master-apprentice relationship of the Deyun Society are managed in this twisted dual-track system.
If Guo Degang treats He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin in full accordance with the traditional master-apprentice relationship, if the two of them take the initiative to jump out of the master's door within the effective time agreed upon by the master-apprentice, you want to say that they are "apprentices who betray the master", then there is some reason.
The problem is that when He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin quit the Deyun Society, they had already worked for the Deyun Society for several years, longer than Guo Degang had worked in the Hongqiao Cultural Center, if they were considered traitors, what about Guo Degang?
The more important place is that Deyun Society also uses the employee system to manage He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin, they have to sign a work contract with Deyun Society, and they belong to Deyun Society employees on the books.
There is a big problem with this dual-track system, think about it from another perspective, if you apply for a company, the boss asks you to kowtow to him to recognize the godfather, and you have the identity of a godson and an employee at the same time. The salary is less, and the boss says what do you have to do with your godfather. You're leaving, and the boss says you can't betray your godfather. You insist on leaving, and the godfather takes out the employee agreement, which says that you will lose money to the company if you leave.
Is this dual-track management a big problem for the company or the employee? Is it the master's problem or the apprentice's big problem?
The worst is probably Cao Yunjin, who is still a rare apprentice in the history of crosstalk to pay tuition. The second miserable may be Chen Xiaohua and Wu Hechen, who were apprentices when there was no accident, and employees when they had accidents, which is also a classic use of the dual-track system.
Of course, there will definitely be netizens who say so, He Yunwei, Cao Yunjin and Yan Zonghai also opened a crosstalk club after leaving Deyun Society, competing with Deyun Society, what is this not a traitor?
The problem is, from the perspective of industry tradition, there is no reason why apprentices cannot open crosstalk clubs. From the perspective of modern enterprise management system, has Deyun signed a non-compete agreement with others? Signing that agreement requires money.
3. Stigmatized short-sightedness
Why did Zhang Heqing contemplate Yan Zonghai as a "traitor"?
One reason is that some employees and apprentices are "showing loyalty", master, master, you look quickly, I will help you scold who is who, you see how loyal I am to you, and bring me more in the future commercial performance.
Similar things can often be seen in other Deyun employees.
Another reason is probably the problem of stigma, and it has to be said that stigmatizing people who leave Deyun seems to be a practice of Deyun Society.
He Yunwei and Cao Yunjin aside, they have been stigmatized for many years, and others, including Xu Deliang, Liu Wenbu, Wang Wenlin and others, have also encountered similar stigmatization problems.
Yan Zonghai also encountered this problem, he just quit the Deyun Society on his front foot, and the saying "Yan Yunda greened Meng Hetang" was spread on the Internet, and it was spread for several years, Yan Zonghai had to refute the rumors, but it still could not stop the massive spread of the Deyun Society's rice circle.
It is naturally self-evident what the purpose of this stigmatization is, since you left Deyun Society and become a competitor of Deyun Society, you must suppress and make your business bad, and because of the existence of Deyun Society's rice circle, stigmatization has been tried and tested.
Some netizens summarized the playing style of Deyun Rice Circle, if you don't respond in the face of stigma, then you are weak-hearted, if you respond like Yan Zonghai, then you are rubbing the heat, that is, suppressing and persecuting Deyun Society, both positive and negative.
However, I believe that such stigmatization of former employees and former apprentices is actually very short-sighted.
If a master or company has a "traitor", it may be a traitor's problem, and if a master or company has a lot of "traitors", is there a problem with the master himself or the company itself?
More seriously, if anyone who leaves the company is called a "traitor", what image does the company have in the eyes of the public?
One more enemy is not as good as one more friend, it is difficult to buy a friend, friends have more ways to go, hype the opposite is actually a double-edged sword, sometimes hurt others, sometimes hurt yourself.