laitimes

Tesla's high-welfare recruitment is causing controversy again, and the "sweatshop" has opened up?

author:Lamb of the Devil 987

On April 15, Tesla's official Weibo announced that its Shanghai Lingang energy storage super factory Megapack began recruitment, covering product research and development, intelligent manufacturing, supply chain, industrial Internet research and development and other fields.

Subsequently, "Tesla China factory ordinary workers monthly salary of 10,000" rushed to the hot search, Tesla high welfare recruitment caused widespread attention from netizens, is it capitalists began to reflect, "sweatshop" enlightened?

Tesla's high-welfare recruitment is causing controversy again, and the "sweatshop" has opened up?

According to informed Tesla staff, a front-line ordinary worker, monthly basic salary of 5K+, other income such as bonuses, allowances, overtime pay, etc., a year of 17 salaries, an average monthly income of nearly 10,000 yuan. In addition, there are 7% five insurances and one housing fund, 5% housing provident fund, free working meals, free shuttles, free commercial insurance for the whole family, etc., and even parents can be reimbursed for medical treatment.

"Meals are in the company, housing has public rental housing, everyone has stocks, workers also have them, you can choose whether to take stocks or cash."

Tesla's high-welfare recruitment is causing controversy again, and the "sweatshop" has opened up?

Tesla has once again raised the welfare benefits of ordinary workers, and I don't know if any entrepreneurs will jump out this time to say that Tesla disrupts the market price of workers. When Tesla first entered China, his salary was 12,000, but he was complained abruptly, directly fractured, and his salary was reduced to 5,000 twice.

Tesla's high-welfare recruitment is causing controversy again, and the "sweatshop" has opened up?

In the first year after the epidemic was released, although the overall economic operation improved, under the impact of the epidemic in the past three years, the employment situation this year is still grim, and even some cities are full of food delivery. It is reported that this year's college graduates will reach 11.58 million, on the one hand, it is difficult for enterprises to recruit workers, especially general workers and technicians, on the other hand, it is difficult to find employment, many young people are not high or low, another reason is the rapid development of self-media platforms in recent years, a variety of live broadcast chaos makes many young people think that it is easy to make money, coupled with the process of rural urbanization, many young people can find similar jobs in their hometowns, and would rather move bricks at home than enter the factory to hit screws, in fact, The main reason why young people do not want to go to factories to suffer is the mismatch of welfare benefits.

Tesla's high-welfare recruitment is causing controversy again, and the "sweatshop" has opened up?

In fact, our domestic really powerful enterprises, the average income of employees is not low, such as Huawei, BYD, CATL, Wei Xiaoli, etc., especially in recent years the rapid development of new energy vehicle manufacturing, according to industry data, 15 head car companies, half of the average monthly salary can reach 10,000 levels. But this is only an average, many enterprises in the middle level, the annual salary of the top is ten times or even dozens of times that of the general workers below, so on average, there is no meaning, 0 and 100 on average and 50. We should pay more attention to the salary and treatment of the lowest employees, because the people at the bottom are the cornerstone of social stability.

Tesla's high-welfare recruitment is causing controversy again, and the "sweatshop" has opened up?

Tesla is still scolded as a sweatshop in Germany, but it seems to have some conscience to us, is it unsatisfactory or our countrymen's requirements are too low? In fact, it is the role of capital, we attack people, but we have to convince others, anyway, we only admit that the outside is in dire straits, and only we ourselves are thriving.

Putting aside national feelings and the consciousness of a big country, from the perspective of a small common people, everyone has the right to choose a better life, and entrepreneurs and capitalists should also assume corresponding social responsibilities and give workers higher welfare benefits.

Tesla's high-welfare recruitment is causing controversy again, and the "sweatshop" has opened up?

Instead of pursuing short-term interests and drastically reducing workers' welfare, we should support those enterprises that respect and protect the rights and interests of workers at the bottom, regardless of the country, rather than a vigorous mocking attack.