#Find Digital Reviewers ##畅聊数码新品 #
The Meizu 20 series has been released for more than a week, leaving aside the unbounded version (mainly expensive). Both Meizu 20 and 20Pro versions are on sale. After two years of dormancy, Meizu finally sent a mobile phone.
Although Huang Zhang is still a shareholder, but now Meizu is already the Meizu of Geely Auto Li Shufu, two years of dormancy, is today's Meizu 20 series up to date?
Let's start with the conclusion, it's hard.
Take the two mobile phones released this time, although the sincerity is full, there are many regrets. Especially Meizu 20 and Meizu 20pro, the gap between the two is very large, one in the sky and one in the ground.
This gap is like: Xiaomi and Redmi, it seems that Meizu also considers positioning this way.
1. Let's talk about Meizu 20 first
This time, Meizu 20 refreshed the lowest price of mobile phones equipped with Snapdragon 8gen2 processor, and the 12+128G version starts at 2999 yuan, which is slightly more conscientious than the 8+128 version of the same price as the competing Z50.
This Meizu 20 focuses on the quality of mobile phones, whether it is from 7.9mm thickness, or the combination of metal middle frame + glass back cover, only 190 grams, ultra-narrow border, no bracket screen, all highlight its positioning as a sub-flagship.
But at this price, where the details are in place, the configuration will basically shrink, and Meizu 20 is no exception.
The first is the Zhou Dongyu arrangement screen produced by BOE, which is a common mobile phone screen arrangement in 2020-2021, Huawei uses the most, and the disadvantage is poor screen fineness.
Since the beginning of 22 years, this arrangement of screens has basically disappeared from various mobile phone conferences. It's been 23 years, and no one knows where Meizu found this inventory.
In addition to the worrying screen quality, the biggest problem of Meizu 20 is tuning. A two-year window can be fatal for a mobile phone maker.
Meizu 20 is equipped with Snapdragon 8gen2, which is theoretically the strongest performance, but in terms of game tuning, its "Genshin" frame rate performance is not as good as some Snapdragon 8+ models.
Since the performance tuning is conservative, presumably the power consumption will not be high, but the battery life of Meizu 20 has basically collapsed to the level of Dimensity 9000, which is embarrassing, it is Snapdragon 8gen2, the performance and power consumption ratio always accounts for one end, right?
Just give flyme10 a little more time.
In terms of taking photos, Meizu does not have much official publicity, it is understandable that taking photos now emphasizes the combination of configuration and algorithms. Meizu's original ability in photography algorithms is relatively limited.
Today, the investment of major factories in photography algorithms is like an arms race, and Meizu's photography is still stuck at the level of two years ago. So Meizu 20 has nothing to say except for 3200W selfies, when it comes to rear, I'm afraid that OPPO and vivio's sub-brands will be a little better than Meizu 20.
Finally, there are problems such as the assembly process of the foundry, which is said to be Foxconn's foundry, and there is also user feedback that seems to be asymmetrical, I feel the same.
Having said all this, although the shortcomings of Meizu 20 are also obvious, I personally think that if you want to buy a Snapdragon 8gen2 mobile phone with both performance and quality at 3000, Meizu 20 may still be the only choice.
Why do you say that? The competitors of Meizu 20 look like Redmi K60pro and Nubia Z50, but the actual positioning of the three is different.
The overall quality of K60pro is good, the main all-round direction, but the feel and quality are not a little worse than Xiaomi 13, and the physical store will understand. In the final analysis, it is still a performance machine, a performance machine equipped with a flagship processor, and the design sense is average. And recently, the pressure from friendly sub-brands has also been relatively great.
Nubia Z50, the game alone is better than K60pro (Genshin), after all, Nubia has relied on the red devil in recent years, the game optimization experience is very rich, and its endurance is even better.
The overall is also relatively balanced, there are no obvious shortcomings, the system is simple (some people think it is simple), the texture is not as good as Meizu 20, but it is certain that it is stronger than K60pro, and there are also excellent designs such as ring flashes.
Therefore, if you don't care so much about battery life, the screen is more acceptable, and it doesn't matter if you take photos, you care about the texture of the phone and the smooth daily performance, Meizu 20 is your dish.
However, where the requirements for any of the screen, photography, and battery life are high, it is better to be cautious. Game + texture choose Z50, the cost performance of the picture considers Redmi and a number of competitors.
2. Let's talk about Meizu 20pro
Combined with the 3999 price in terms of configuration and appearance, it can be called the most perfect quasi-flagship with texture and configuration.
It is not too much to praise Meizu 20pro, everyone says that it looks like the Samsung S series, the S series is originally the world-wide Android king, and the sense of design is first-class.
The configuration on paper of Meizu 20pro is not bad, Samsung E6 screen 2K resolution, flagship Snapdragon 8gen2CPU, rear 3 Samsung 5000W lenses, the body is thin enough, the border is narrow enough, there are functions.
Well, high-frequency dimming does not, people with sensitive eyes should be cautious.
Although Meizu 20Pro is 1,000 yuan more expensive than Meizu 20, the gap in actual configuration is more than 1,000 yuan, which is what this article calls a heaven and an underground.
At the press conference, everyone looked at the appearance and parameters, and said that Meizu 20 Pro is more perfect than Xiaomi 13, and there is nothing wrong with this. But this is said on paper.
The problem of Meizu 20pro is the same as that of 20, which is the problem caused by Meizu Technology's two-year window period.
1. There are still problems with battery life, and theoretically there is still room for improvement by system updates.
2, 3 5000W rear, the camera algorithm is basically not comparable to OV Huarong Mi, and the system also has small bugs
As for the quality control quality of Meizu 20pro on the Internet, I think we should not fall into the words of both pink and black, time will verify everything, and user evaluation in this regard is more reliable than self-media.
Finally, everyone will compare Meizu 20Pro and Xiaomi Mi 13, who calls the entry price the same. In fact, the positioning of the two is also different.
Xiaomi 13 mainly plays with a small-screen flagship, so it simply did not go on the 2K screen, emphasizing a thin, there is no pile of parameters on the photo, but after 1 year of cooperation with Leica, the algorithm has improved a lot, which shows that there is a lot of investment in this aspect. The battery life is also good.
Meizu 20Pro is a standard-size flagship, heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 13 is certain, but the thickness is narrower than 13, and the texture is excellent. The screen is similar in other aspects except for 2K, and there is no high-frequency dimming.
Meizu 20pro photography is general, no way, algorithm accumulation is smashed out by money and time, although the 20pro lens parameters are better, but taking pictures is indeed inferior to 13. By the way, Meizu 20pro also has ultrasonic fingerprints,
In short, if you don't have too high requirements for taking photos, just want a quasi-flagship phone with excellent quality, Meizu 20pro is still a good choice.
Why do I have to say that Meizu 20Pro is a quasi-flagship, no way, in recent years, major manufacturers have hyped the importance of taking photos to the sky, they just publicize it has nothing to do with me, I am King Kong legs are not iron head gong.