During this period, many tourist areas have introduced RV management regulations. Reviews of these provisions have been mixed. However, it also caused some concern. That is the standard of the law, whether it is controlled by the state or the locality. Is it possible for a legitimate thing to increase obligations at will because of local interests?
1. In the era of chaotic legal system, some illegal regulations often appear
Our country is a country governed by the rule of law. All along, the process of rule of law on the mainland has promoted the development of society, and our achievements in the rule of law have attracted worldwide attention. However, it should also be pointed out that our rule of law norms today have been achieved through the efforts of countless legal workers. It doesn't happen naturally.
In that era of chaotic legal system, local governments arbitrarily formulated management regulations in order to realize their own interests, creating chaos in legal order on a regional scale. In those chaotic times, each of us felt not security, but danger and inconvenience.
In order to realize economic benefits, local governments set up card fees everywhere on the road. Other localities use various administrative means to prevent the flow of goods from outside the country into the local area and carry out local protection. It seems that these measures achieve certain local interests, but undermine the rule of law in the country as a whole.
Second, the RV people who make the tourist area helpless are not the enemies of the tourist area
I have seen that many local friends in tourist areas have a phrase that is often mentioned, that is, white. Actually, I don't understand this formulation very much. The state belongs to the people as a whole, and public resources cannot be monopolized by some people. Chinese citizens should enjoy public resources no matter where they are within China. There is nothing to say here, everyone is a family.
Tourists from the south who come to the north can also enjoy the various public service resources of the north. In the final analysis, these public facilities are built by the government, belong to the state, and belong to all the people.
RV passengers arrive at the tourist area, not without consumption. It's about having more autonomy over consumption. In the past, when tourists entered the tourist area, they would be subjected to various routines. Some scenic spots have sky-high seafood and black tour guides to slaughter customers, which can be regarded as an open secret. However, these seem to be difficult for RV guests. Because RVs have more choices when it comes to eating and lodging.
The cost of RVs is actually not low, how can a person who can afford to drive an RV not afford to spend. If you don't consume, you need to consider whether the accommodation cost of tens of thousands of dollars a night is reasonable, and whether the price of catering repeatedly appears sky-high and needs to be corrected. Letting RVs get out of their RVs on their own to receive services is far more effective and legal than administratively driving RVs out of their RVs.
Third, the RV is legal, and the obligation imposed is unreasonable
RVs are a legal means of transportation. For legal means of transportation, how to manage it, national laws have long been stipulated. This creates a problem by engaging in artificial policy operations for local interests. Why RVs are protected elsewhere and restricted in yours.
Is it because of the inconsistency of the law, or because of local selfishness. The country's legal system is always unified, always challenging the national legal order to meet local interests, emphasizing its own particularity, which is actually a retrogression of the rule of law work. This is also the most important consideration for worry.
4. Urban uncivilized law enforcement should target the uncivilized behavior itself, and should not allude to specific groups of people
Some governments have added the content of urban civilized law enforcement to the management of RVs. In fact, uncivilized behavior exists in every city. The target of law enforcement should also be the incivility itself.
I don't believe all RV people have behaved uncivilly. I also don't believe that the perennial dishonest management and abduction behavior in the tourist area is caused by RV passengers. I believe that all incivility is only the individual behavior of an individual, and that the uncivility itself should be addressed in order to be addressed.
Fifth, urban governance must have great wisdom, not be reckless!
Urban governance has always been a big issue. The introduction of any measure requires research and careful thinking. I believe that if you drive away the RV, the public resources of the tour area will still be tight. Because you're a tourist city, it's a long-standing subject. You should improve your service capacity and solve problems step by step. If the shortage of public resources is alleviated by driving others away, it is not legal, let alone in the long-term interests of the local community.
Finally, it is a suggestion, maybe the construction of the service platform in the tour area will make the resource allocation more scientific and reasonable. The more you work, the greater the rewards will naturally be. A planned effort is always more efficient than a reckless effort without a plan!
The pictures in this article come from the copyright owner, and any website, newspaper, TV station, company, organization or individual may not use it in part or in whole without the permission of the copyright owner.