laitimes

U20 national football team lost to Japan, is Dong Lu's point of view right when commenting?

author:Times
U20 national football team lost to Japan, is Dong Lu's point of view right when commenting?

U20 small negative strong Japan, the result is acceptable, but the process still needs to improve and improve!

Before the match, in the face of the powerful Japanese team, the media and fans were generally pessimistic, but as a 03 and 04 age group players, this U20 team is still highly anticipated! The main reason is that compared with the previous age group, 03, 04 this batch of good seedlings is more, the strength is also a little stronger, today's competition is actually a very meaningful test.

As the commentator of the live broadcast game on the Migu platform, Dong Lu, who himself is also engaged in football youth training, still emphasizes the views he has always adhered to during the commentary process.

That is, Chinese players at this stage cannot play complex football!

Is this correct? In this 1-2 defeat to Japan, combined with Dong Lu's specific views when commenting, it can be analyzed and pondered, and it should be more interesting.

U20 national football team lost to Japan, is Dong Lu's point of view right when commenting?

As a football commentary dedicated to youth training, Dong Lu's views have always been controversial, and it is his view that the national football team cannot play complex football at this stage.

Opinion 1: As a weak party whose strength is obviously not superior, it must adhere to the playing style of shrinking defense, and cannot invest too much in attack, otherwise the gains will outweigh the losses.

Not to mention that the goal of the dream opening of the U20 national football team was due to the opening pressure hit Japan by surprise, in the 19th and a half minutes of the game, the national football team had a quick counterattack, forming a threatening cross and attack, Dong Lu did not praise this attack for the first time, but lamented that there are not many players who are involved in the attack, otherwise it will be very easy to concede a goal if it is counterattacked.

But all the time, without counterattack, the physical and psychological suffering of the players is very large. The subsequent course of the competition also confirmed this. In your tactical system, as the weak side, only the defense and no counterattack are really passively beaten until you have a physical and mental breakdown, and then you are overturned.

Of course, counterattack is not you want to play can play, in the case of your strength is obviously weak, this requires the head coach to design the corresponding counterattack tactics according to the characteristics of the players, and let the players resolutely implement on the field, which is a very test of the coach's skill and level. If a manager coaches a weak team, he is completely deadly, passively beaten, and has no way to fight back, I think this is extremely irresponsible to the team.

U20 national football team lost to Japan, is Dong Lu's point of view right when commenting?

Blindly sticking to it, no counterattack, the consumption of mental and physical energy is very large, often after losing the ball is the beginning of the collapse!

Opinion 2: The defensive tactics of the U20 national football team must be formulated by domestic coaches such as Shao Jiayi, and Spanish foreign coaches may not be able to respect this style of play.

The subtext of Dong Lu's view is that foreign coaches do not necessarily understand the level and execution of Chinese players, and question that foreign coaches cannot teach according to aptitude and local conditions. Combined with the progress of the game, in fact, it can be seen that whether it is a foreign coach or a Chinese assistant coach like Shao Jiayi, they do not insist on sticking to the playing style on the field.

Although the scene is passive and completely suppressed, it can be seen that some of the head coach's counterattack ideas are indeed not fully kicked out because of comprehensive factors such as execution, personal ability, physical fitness, and tactical substitution. The choice between attack and defense in football is itself contradictory, and any choice must bear risks.

If they are overtaken, and they still want to stick to and miss fewer goals, they will only fall into a desperate situation of passive beating, unlimited consumption of mental and physical energy until the oil runs out, and in the end, not only lose, but also lose ugly. Of course, you can't raise the bar and say, will I just press out and fight, in terms of strength comparison, isn't it worse to lose?

U20 national football team lost to Japan, is Dong Lu's point of view right when commenting?

Whether it is a Chinese coach or a foreign head coach, in fact, they do not fully adhere to the rigid playing style, but the design of defensive counterattack tactics needs to be polished in more detail

In fact, no, 1-2 behind, you still need to adhere to the defensive counterattack style of play, and relatively invest more troops in the attack, the advantage of taking this risk is that while letting the other party feel the pressure, a more proactive style of play can make your physical and mental consumption smaller. Of course, this still depends on the mature tactical routines designed by the head coach and the resolute execution of the players on the field, otherwise it is also for nothing, and I think this is where the role and value of the head coach are reflected.

Opinion 3: Strong teams break dense defenses and weak teams fight back, all need one trick - 45 degrees to blow up.

In this day's game, Japan's equalizer and comeback goal seems to have come from the threat of a high school striker and a more direct cross from the wing. But if you carefully analyze the Japanese team's wide crosses, you will find that every effective cross is preceded by countless foot movements in the midfield, especially the non-stop footing from one side to the other, and the combination of the two ribs after the breakaway to form a gap cross.

That is, the Japanese team is not brainless 45 degrees as soon as it arrives in the front court, but through effective passing mobilization, it finds the defensive blank area of the national football team, forms a local advantage, and effectively crosses, which is the correct way to break the dense defense.

Similarly, if the national football team on the weak side, when counterattacking, it is brainless 45 ° explosion, and there is no arrangement for the reception of the high school forward, the design of grabbing two points and three points, and in the end, it is only to return the ball to the opponent.

U20 national football team lost to Japan, is Dong Lu's point of view right when commenting?

The Japanese team plays high school forwards, and the tactic of kicking on the wing is designed, not brainless 45 degrees

It should be said that the views thrown out by Dong Lu when explaining are not necessarily all wrong. The most obvious loophole or can the weak team really only swing the bus, open the big foot to defend, and then passively wait for death? Don't resist a bit? Struggling a bit? Don't rabbits bite when they are in a hurry? Are Chinese players really inferior to rabbits?

As far as I, an ordinary fan who is not in tune, of course, the level is not as good as Dong Lugao, who is doing practice, but I still think that the national football players still have not found a suitable tactical playing method and resolutely implemented it, and many times they can't find the rhythm while kicking, and they are out of order, how to play after leading, how to play when they are behind, and how to reasonably distribute physical energy, which is not too clear.

In a word, the rhythm of the game cannot keep up, there is no rhythm of its own, and it is always passively following and kicking. This is probably a common problem for national teams of different ages. And I think that regardless of the big level and the big environment, as far as the construction of a team is concerned, this is a problem that the head coach should solve!

U20 national football team lost to Japan, is Dong Lu's point of view right when commenting?

There must be no way out, and the same is true for weak teams, which requires the coaching staff to design mature, executable and targeted tactical routines

In the end, today's U20 national football team did its best, the strength gap is obvious, just a small loss, I can accept this result, but the coaching staff should think more about the way, rather than as Dong Lu explained the view, just stick, die, die, this is also no way out.

After Li Tie, Chen Jiayuan and Chen Yongliang were arrested, can naturalized players play a role in the new national football team?

Which one do you prefer? Take stock of the professional football stadiums of Chinese Super League teams in the new season!

Big brother, you play football, what is the use of you playing it? Liu Qiangdong is playing football again?

Read on