As we all know, in general, public figures like well-known singers, ordinary people rarely have the opportunity to intersect with them.
However, on the day of September 23, a B station owner was "hooked up" by the well-known singer Lin Junjie, but only claimed 275,000 yuan...
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="6" >01</h1>
The process of this matter is like this, there is an up master named "Guagua Mars", his B station space has a large number of AI face-changing videos, in terms of production quality, it is also a bit of a technical up master.
There are many star figures involved, in addition to the above-mentioned Lin Junjie, as well as Wang Zulan, Jay Chou, Chen Guanxi and others, the latest work is Huang Xiaoming's version of "human high-quality male" in early August.
The news report mentioned that there were as many as 6 AI face-changing videos related to Lin Junjie in his original space, including Lin Junjie's version of "See You Again" and "Huan Zhu GeGe".
With such a high-tech live video, the up master has gained 51,000 fans and a total of 826,000 likes, which can be regarded as a small and famous existence.
Just when he was still enjoying the peaceful life of the up master, he suddenly received a lawyer's letter from Lin Junjie, which not only mentioned his own name, but also implicated The B station in passing.
As soon as the incident came out, it was quickly on top of the hot search, triggering a heated discussion among netizens.
According to the announcement, the plaintiff Lin Junjie's litigation grounds were that the defendant infringed on his own portrait rights, and demanded that the defendant compensate 250,000 yuan for economic losses, 20,000 yuan for mental damage, and 5,000 yuan for reasonable expenses on rights protection costs, with a total total compensation amount of 275,000 yuan.
This amount of compensation is simply astronomical for an ordinary family, even if this up owner may have made a lot of money before making videos, but I estimate that in the end it will still lose a lot of money.
On this matter, netizens are also talking about it, but from the overall level, everyone is obviously still on Lin Junjie's side.
This is not out of the fans' feelings for the idol, but out of legal ideas, just like the lawyer's letter announcement mentioned, AI face change is an illegal act of infringing on the right to portrait, since it is a crime, being caught can only be considered unlucky.
And according to some netizens, he used Lin Junjie to play AI to change his face not out of liking and playing terriers, but was dissatisfied with another up owner's evaluation of Lin Junjie's singing skills higher than his favorite singer, so he was upset and repeatedly took Lin Junjie to spoof.
This up master has been reminded many times by B station and Lin Junjie fans not to play too much a few months ago, but he obviously did not listen to it, and still went his own way.
When he received the lawyer's letter from Lin Fang, it was at the end of last year, when he did not know the seriousness of the situation, or he remained blind, and as a result, on September 23, the retribution finally came.
If what the netizens said is true, then the up lord was sued by others, it is really not unjust at all, and it can even be said that he deserves it.
AI face-changing public figures themselves infringe on the right to portraits, and they also deliberately prank others and do not listen to the advice of others, then this practice should be punished even more.
From this matter alone, the behavior of the up lord is absolutely illegal, and Lin Junjie also has the right to sue him.
But to take things further, the issues involved are a bit complicated, like this spoof video made by the owner of the up, we all collectively call them "ghost animals".
The "ghost animal" is a major feature in the B station two creation video, the big guys use their own whimsy and high-tech power to integrate a variety of interesting materials, so as to become a video full of laughter. But this issue becomes very complicated when the material used in ghost animal videos involves portrait rights or copyright of works.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="97" >02</h1>
Generally speaking, the "persecution" objects of ghost animal videos are basically some very famous beings, including but not limited to entertainment stars, film and television character images, two-dimensional roles, Internet celebrity anchors, demonic characters and so on.
And most of the ghost animal videos have the use of real characters as the whole living material, if it is a role in the film and television works, it is fine, but in case of non-film and television works of characters, it is easy to involve the problem of portrait rights.
Like the previous CXK basketball video, at that time, the video work of similar materials on the B station can be said to grab a big hand, and many netizens' whole activity machine is also the same as the above up master, which is because of everyone's dissatisfaction with CXK and the prank.
And this incident also caused CXK to send a lawyer's letter to station B, warning them to stop this spoof, and CXK fans even threatened to blow up station B, of course, the result did not succeed, everyone is still having fun.
However, even if we are not accustomed to CXK, he still has the right to use legal means to protect his own interests, just because we are dissatisfied with others, so we have to spoof him like this, even if it infringes on his portrait rights, it does not matter?
If you do it more and more outrageously, it will easily cross the line, and even easily become another kind of malicious behavior that harms others, and then I am afraid it will not be as simple as a lawyer's letter.
The fundamental motivation for us to be ghost animals is still derived from our own personal likes and dislikes, and we know how to avoid offending others as much as possible when we like and feel good materials.
And when we encounter something we don't like, we may have a certain contemptuous mentality to deceive him and slander him, that is, to play an offensive effect.
When personal likes and dislikes completely replace objective moral evaluations, the so-called struggle for justice will degenerate into mutual insults and insults, and at that time will you still think that such a ghost animal is still for fun at the beginning?
Everything has a degree, ghost animal pranks are also bounded, after all, some people care, some people don't care, and the main factor affecting this is whether your video behavior will harm the interests of others.
Generally speaking, as long as your ghost animal video does not have any behavior to vilify the image of others (provided that the positive characters are), perhaps the other party will temporarily acquiesce, as long as it is not too much.
Secondly, when the object of the prank warns you, you should immediately stop and stop this kind of ghost animal behavior, otherwise you really have to meet in court, and someone may fast forward to this step at the beginning, but this phenomenon is rare, most of them are first warned to the creator, after all, no one wants to fight a lawsuit, right.
All in all, the moral boundary of the ghost animal is in the heart of each of our B station users, you can spoof, but you can not have the phenomenon of excessive ugliness, and even if there is, it must be appropriate, don't wait until the end of the game.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="98" >03</h1>
Ghost animal videos, as a new thing of modern young people, are still in a stage of barbaric growth, although there are indeed many funny and interesting masterpieces, but the kind of vulgar and bad taste works also exist.
If we don't want such a source of happiness to stink the whole pot of porridge because of a few "mouse shi", then should we not be self-conscious and resolutely report the boycott in the face of the kind of spoof video that makes people feel uncomfortable?
I hope that the future ghost animal videos can develop in a good direction