Today we will talk about the Indian movie "Jay Bhim".
The title is Jai Bhim (2021), alias Viva Bhim / Long Live the Struggle.
Jay Bhim was IMDb's most popular Indian movie that year, the most searched Indian film of the year, and the fourth most tweeted movie of 2021 on Twitter.
The film is based on the 1993 Rajakannu case handled by Judge K Chandru, who said in an interview that he was most impressed by the case and wrote it into a film script.
The story takes place in India, where Rajakannu, a low-caste man, was arrested on suspicion of theft and subjected to inhumane treatment, and Rajaqanu's wife, Sengeni, went around asking for help and seeking justice from human rights lawyer Chandru.
The personal charm of the male protagonist in the film, the heart-wrenching shock of the supporting characters, the oppression brought by the heavy theme, and the hearty narrative technique are perfectly integrated, allowing the audience to feel the plight of oppression and humiliation of the marginalized and vulnerable groups in society.
It is recommended that you watch this movie, especially people with low blood pressure, after watching this movie, low blood pressure will be good on the spot.
The film is an Indian film that explores police brutality and caste violence. Instead of setting in common villages and police stations, the film is set on a more critical courtroom that serves as the main stage to defend the bottom line of the law, forcing state power to reflect.
The real case depicted in the film dragged on in real life for more than a decade, and is the longest habeas corpus case in the history of the Chennai High Court in Tamil Nadu, India. In the film this case dragged on for only a year.
Judge Chandru, who discussed the intention of the film to post-production and was closely involved throughout the process, said in an interview with the Federal Daily, "This film is not only a retelling of Sangeny's tragic story, but also reveals more about the persecution of vulnerable groups such as the Irula tribe." ”
After the film's release, the male protagonist, Surya, received numerous death threats from different parts of India.
The men accused Surya of deliberately orchestrating the case to "deliberately" create conflict between the Vanniyars and Irulars tribes.
After receiving death threats, Surya received special police protection at his residence.
The experiences of Rajakanu and Sangeni reflect caste brutality, abject poverty, police corruption and many other problems.
The family does handyman work for the parliamentarian, but does not even have the right to register their names; Sangeni tried to ask the local councillor for help, and the councillor responded that the untouchables had no votes and would never take care of the untouchables; Rajakanu worked all his life as a cow and horse, and made countless bricks, but he could not live in a brick house; Low-caste people are arbitrarily arrested by the police to commit crimes, and the way the police communicate with low-caste people is nothing but a slap in the face.
As long as one does not achieve social freedom, then the freedom provided by the law is of no use to anyone.
Have the magnates stopped oppressing the poor? The answer is no. This film tells all this very appropriately with a real case, between rehabilitation and injustice, there are still some determined people who are creating heroic stories.
The male protagonist, Suria, often appears in the film with the sculptures of Karl Marx, alongside Ambedkar and Perial. This is not simply a set prop, on the contrary, each frame exudes a strong ideological flavor, and the film pays homage to the three of them in this way. I can't think of anyone other than communism who cares about these poor victims of the caste system.
This is a film that reflects institutional violence without scruples.
Why can bad people ignore all legal systems to infringe on good people, but good people should follow all legal systems to prove their innocence?
Every line of dialogue in the film is very deep, every expression is very measured, and every message is very meaningful. Through such an intense film, the director powerfully portrays the silent suffering of the oppressed.
This film accurately recreates the cases handled by Judge Chandler when he was a lawyer.
Many people may not know Judge Chandler, one of the most respected judges in the legal profession, known for his decisions that affect a large number of poor and oppressed people in society.
It is well known that a judge makes an average of about 10,000 to 20,000 rulings during his career, while Judge Chandru has handed down a whopping 96,000 rulings, including rulings that guaranteed employment for 25,000 poor women in the lunch program.
"Jay Beam" does not make the male protagonist an omnipotent savior like other entertainment movies in India, without untimely songs and dances, and without fighting that ignores physics, but focuses on portraying a well-founded human rights lawyer who petitions for the people.
Chandler is not a savior, not an invincible Superman or a rich Batman, he is just an ordinary person with flesh and blood, he also has joys, sorrows, and fears, but he does not flinch, but relies on his self-confidence to overcome fear.
With its profound ideological and heavy performance content, the film has created an impeccable film worthy of the various honors and praise he has received.
Speak for justice for the people,
Fight for humanity for conscience.
This is a hardcore movie fan distribution center, welcome to pay attention to the public account: Miaokan Film and Television