laitimes

How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan? The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them. The U.S. Navy conducted it with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers

author:Sea Urchin Film

How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan?

The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them.

The U.S. Navy conducted tests with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers, firing five heavy torpedoes and more than 15 Tomahawk anti-ship missiles.

This saturation blow has not yet sunk.

In theory, the aircraft carrier is not easy to sink, but when the aircraft carrier is hit by a missile, the carrier aircraft catches fire, the fuel explodes, and the aircraft carrier becomes a sea of fire, which may become scrap iron.

The aircraft carrier is an aircraft transport take-off and landing platform, so the loss of this function is a pile of scrap iron, and the attack on the aircraft carrier is not for the purpose of sinking.

1. The core is the 4 catapults that need to destroy the aircraft carrier.

This thing cannot be repaired at sea without returning to the dock.

It is better to smash a few large craters on the take-off deck.

The special steel on the carrier's flight deck can only be repaired in the dock.

As long as there are not enough fighter jets to take off, the aircraft carrier is a logistics ship!

2. As long as the aircraft carrier tilts the hull to a certain extent, the aircraft cannot take off and land the aircraft carrier normally.

This effect is more shocking than sinking an aircraft carrier and is a greater blow to the enemy.

Because the enemy will send people to rescue the wounded aircraft carrier.

Then it is easy to hit an opponent who is powerless to fight back at this time.

At present, with China's strength, it is not difficult to make two US aircraft carriers lose their combat effectiveness!

The difficulty was that more than 5 U.S. aircraft carriers lost their combat effectiveness.

That's a bit of a bit!

Netizen hot comments:

1, can hit two, you can hit more.

2, for the attack aircraft carrier, there is no need to sink, as long as the aircraft carrier is injured, the aircraft on the aircraft carrier cannot take off.

3. Can you use a stagnant bomb? If everyone dies, will they still have combat effectiveness?

4, no one has tried, how to know how many bombs can be beaten.

5, the crew is dead, what is the use of the ship. #I'm going to make headlines##军事 #

How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan? The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them. The U.S. Navy conducted it with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers
How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan? The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them. The U.S. Navy conducted it with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers
How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan? The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them. The U.S. Navy conducted it with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers
How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan? The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them. The U.S. Navy conducted it with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers
How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan? The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them. The U.S. Navy conducted it with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers
How hard was it for the PLA to sink the USS Reagan? The Ronald Reagan has about 2,000 watertight compartments in its hull, and it doesn't make much sense to break through dozens of them. The U.S. Navy conducted it with Nimitz-class nuclear carriers

Read on