Although domestic Android mobile phone manufacturers have "made rapid progress" in recent years, why is the gap with Apple still so far away?
The root of the matter lies in product design and system. The product design includes the exterior design and the internal structure design, which is really incomparable with Apple.
13
Many people say that Android phones have large batteries, good battery life, and fast charging. Why can't I sell apples? Don't forget that these advantages of Android phones come at the expense of phone size.
First look at the data (the following are representatives of the three brands' respective size screens):
Apple 13: 146.7mm*71.5mm*7.65mm
Vivo x80：164.95mm*75.23mm*8.3mm
Mate40:158.6mm*72.5mm*8.8mm
Apple 13promax: 160.8mm*78.1mm*7.65mm
Vivo x80pro: 164.57mm*75.3mm*9.1mm
Mate40pro: 162.9mm*75.5mm*9.1mm
13Dec
The above two sets of data is not difficult to see, Apple mobile phone compared to Android size to control better, I have also seen a lot of disassembly videos, the internal structure at a glance found that Android internal and Apple is not in the same grade. That's why the Android phone battery is "bigger", if apple 13promax also puts the same size as the Android phone, it can fully put in a 5000 mAh battery or even larger. But then it loses its feel and portability.
System this piece, many people think that THE IOS is too closed or something, here is not to say that the IOS is good or bad. But the OPTIMIZATION of the IOS system for the APP is considered to the extreme, the Apple 13 with a 3200 mAh battery does not lose Android's 4500 mA at all, why is this? This is because the Android system is too "open", resulting in extreme power consumption of app operation, coupled with the Snapdragon CPU is not powerful, Android even if it has a 5000 mAh battery, the battery life is far less than Apple's 4300 mAh. This point hopes that Android manufacturers will focus on their respective operating systems, less fancy, more pragmatic.
x80pro
In terms of design, Android manufacturers may be in order to differentiate competition, flagship curved screen. It's not about how bad it is, but it's really not good either. In addition to looking good, the curved screen is really not an advantage. Not to mention the increase in cost, the later maintenance and film are difficult to go to the sky. Honestly do a straight screen flagship can't do it? Users want a product experience, not just a flower rack.
Apple's success lies in refining on top of the original success, rather than blindly pursuing so-called innovation. Users pay a high price to buy a mobile phone, but also hope to use it, not good-looking. I admit that some domestic machine parameters and appearance look good now, but why is it still not selling well, and it is still complained about? For example, Xiaomi's 12SPRO, the lens into the gray, rough workmanship. Huawei's MATE40PRO series BOE green screen. Mobile phone fever may be Qualcomm's pot, but in addition to heat, domestic mobile phones are really done?
mate40pro
It's easy to make a phone bigger, but it's hard to be small. Originally, I was also disgusted with 13promax is too big and too heavy, I want to change android support, and the result of a study found that I was sloppy, and compared with Android phones, Apple mobile phones are actually small. So what other reason do I have to use Android? For that so-called one hundred million pixels? The so-called super fast charge? Or the so-called portrait beauty camera?
Conclusion: I sincerely hope that Android mobile phone factories will make products with good care, and those plastic borders and curved screens really don't do it. I also don't need any 200W charging, 60W is enough.