Xian Zi sued Zhu Jun for sexual harassment and dropped the gavel. Zhu Jun won the case. While looking for information, I stumbled upon a review I wrote in 2020. I forgot it when I finished writing it.
☟ Swipe up and down to see more
Slide for more photos
Looking back 2 years later, it was found that in fact, the development of the whole event was absurdly based on the "base points" mentioned that year.
Even the public's tendency to flip is related to the failure of the string side to firmly hold the basic plate at the above basis points.
The case is settled. I asked an ordinary person next to me who had absolutely no likes or dislikes about this matter: "Do you think there was sexual harassment that day?" ”
He said, "That's a bad thing to say. ”
For Zhu Jun, the four words of "really bad to say" are enough to abolish his half-life accumulation.
For Xianzi, the four words "really can't say well" are enough to make her lose the lawsuit, and the identity of the leader of the feminist movement accumulated in the past 4 years has been boycotted and questioned.
Japanese female journalist Shiori Ito sued the Washington bureau chief of TBS Television for sexual assault, winning the civil case. One of the most important reasons is that Ito has come up with a lot of irrefutable evidence. The part without evidence, even in the public eye, can also reasonably infer that "everything happened".
For example, Keiyuki Yamaguchi did invite Ito to dinner and drink, and Ito once drank and lost consciousness in the privacy of their room.
Keiyuki Yamaguchi's weekday style comments and Japanese men's domineering and lustful behavior are well known to the world. The arrogance and self-righteousness of powerful men in Japan against women is taken for granted and rarely punished.
And the South Korean chaebol's brutality and unscrupulousness towards Korean actresses is a "black box" that can never be torn open, and you don't even have the opportunity to discuss or unveil it.
The String and Zhu Jun cases, which ended with insufficient evidence, are compared with the Ito case, what is the difference? First of all, Ito and Yamaguchi did not meet for the first time, and when they met hastily, Yamaguchi invited female journalists who had come to apply for jobs to eat and drink alone, which meant that fools understood.
There is an irrefutable oppressive relationship of power between him and her.
Secondly, the two drink together, Yamaguchi violated Ito after she lost consciousness, and after Ito reported the case, the Tokyo police had already filed a case and prepared to arrest Yamaguchi, but it was interrupted. However, on the day of the arrest, the operation was stopped by the Metropolitan Police Agency of Japan, and all the police officers and prosecutors in charge of the case were also transferred from the case. In 2016, police announced that the case would not be prosecuted because of insufficient evidence.
With these hammers, fools can see that at least Yamaguchi really put his hands on Ito and used her mood to seek employment and coerce her.
However, the scene shown by the string side is, in the logic of life, 18,000 miles away from the Ito case.
For example, the two sides are meeting for the first time.
Even if we assume that Zhu Jun is a veteran fisherman, he must also be experienced, and he will really do something to a girl who meets for the first time, a girl who has no idea that the root is not her own superior-subordinate relationship, and is still in a dressing room with a hidden door and people coming and going?
For daily use, the powder room door is obscured
The circle position is the makeup position where Zhu Jun was located that year
As long as there is one person in the middle, even if it is a passerby who pushes the door in the wrong door (opposite is the CCTV internal convenience store), just bumps into it, Zhu Jun is finished.
Even if Zhu Jun is not a person of good character, he cannot be such a crazy and unwise person! If so, he must have had a bad track record, so why hasn't a second (even anonymous) victim been collected in 4 years?
Looking back at Ali's case. The matter between Ali Nu and Zhang Jun is actually similar to the matter that Ito told Yamaguchi, and the situation is similar. A man and a woman drink together, the woman loses consciousness after drinking, the man moves his hands and feet, the man insists that the woman is voluntary, and the woman insists that she was coerced to drink and was forcibly molested.
In Japan, Ito failed to send Keiyuki Yamaguchi to prison, but in the Ali case, Zhang Jun, who used his hands and feet on her, was actually sentenced to 1 and a half years. The basis of the judgment is that the woman is unconscious when she drinks alcohol, and she does not explicitly invite you to have intimate behavior, and you use your hands and feet to force indecency.
Although this verdict is very controversial, because the address of her room was told to Zhang Jun by Ali Nu, and she did call him many times late at night. However, Zhang Jun's judgment has a legal basis.
The disclosure of various details in Ito's case, even if not criminally valid, would make the public fully trust her, and most of her supporters.
It is mostly in line with the logic of life.
In the case of Xian Zi v. Zhu Jun, the details disclosed so far are too many bugs. Let's talk about a detail that caused most people to flip: when the string side issued a long article 4 years ago condemning Zhu Jun for molesting the string, it withheld a message: "After the police, the clothes fragments were submitted for DNA testing, but the police responded that no second person's DNA was detected, so the evidence was insufficient and the case was not filed." ”
This information was unknown to many people who supported the strings at that time. Then it was mentioned in court cross-examination, and after the online disclosure, it was embarrassing.........
The string side responded by suggesting that the police were catty and demanding a re-test.
The core reason why almost all news parties later overturned was this: withholding some crucial information that was not good for them. Indeed, in the beginning, withholding information makes it easy to pull sympathy points to the maximum. Just think about it, if The string honestly said in the first long article: "I reported the case, and the police did a DNA test, but told me that no dna of the second person was detected, so Zhu Jun sexually harassed me and I was not filed" - the first long article, will it still cause such a big storm? No.
However, if you choose to trust her supporters, the endurance will be very strong.
It is far more long than unconditional trust and then finding that you have hidden, have the effect of guiding me, and want to go further.
The details of the follow-up Zhu Jun's side were revealed one by one, the dressing room was semi-open, and no less than ten people came in in the middle, and the string was indeed not a program intern, but a friend brought in by the intern to "interview Zhu Jun" (which means that the two sides do not have a direct superior-subordinate relationship), which also means that the string can leave the dressing room anytime and anywhere.
Some netizens who supportEd Zhu Jun said: "Since so many people have come in before and after, you can completely take the opportunity to leave, even if you are embarrassed to call for help, but at least when someone is there, I will not disturb Teacher Zhu Jun, I will not disturb me to go first, this is always OK, right?" Why did you stay for 45 minutes until the program recording started? "These details are hidden in advance, and then later dug up by the opposing party, which is very unfavorable." Obviously let the people who once stood on the strings unconditionally calm down, and even feel like eating flies in their hearts.
There are some lawsuits that are lost, but win the support of the people. Some lawsuits are won, but they lose badly at the level of public opinion. Some lawsuits can be a win-win situation. There are also lawsuits that win the hearts and minds of the people, win the verdict, but lose life.