Recently, the official media tearing up caused by a surging news report is really surprising.
Surging news, focusing on current politics and ideas. This is the slogen of the media. It is undeniable that from its past words and reports, the surging news has indeed written a lot of in-depth reports. As a senior text code farmer, the author also paid special attention to all the self-media accounts of the surging news, hoping to draw more views from them.
However, I don't know when this media belonging to the Shanghai Poster Industry Group has changed its taste. Far from it, if you look at a few news stories up closely, whether it is purely by the headline party to attract people, or whether it is deliberately exaggerated and peeping in the tube, it is not known.
As an authoritative media, the author has been "fortunate" to have been exposed. 7 years ago, the author was the principal of a private vocational school in South China, when there was a safety accident in which a student died, and the police intervened to commit suicide with the student's psychological problems. This is already conclusive. However, the intervention of the surging news has made the incident continue to ferment, and the exaggerated method has hyped up an accident of a student's death that is already a well-established fact into a hot spot. As usual, the author arranged for the staff to come to the door to do an in-depth exchange and communication with the reporter who reported, hoping to reduce the negative impact (frankly, if the private school is negatively reported, it may lead to a sharp decline in enrollment that year, and then may go bankrupt). Unabashedly, I also arranged public relations fees, but in the case of this established fact of the police, the school actively appeased the parents' emotions and took full responsibility to deal with the students' aftermath, and in the case that the surging news reporter collected our public relations fees, the surging news XX reporter station still issued two consecutive reports on its own...
This title is simply irresponsible
Now that I think about it, the media is free speech, and journalists are the uncrowned kings, which is understandable. However, does exaggerating the facts need to be supervised? Freedom of speech is a double-edged sword.
When I think about it now, the faces of the surging journalists a few years ago, I really can't remember whether they still have a trace of literati bones on them.