laitimes

The situation in the Balkans is not stable? Vucic went to Kosovo to negotiate, and NATO's attitude was unusual

author:Ticket Yao Lieutenant

According to the domestic media "Observer Network", in recent days, large-scale protests and demonstrations have broken out in the northern part of Kosovo, and ethnic Serb demonstrators have erected barricades in the streets to oppose the "ban on Serbian license plates and documents" to be promulgated by the Kosovo government. At the height of the protests, there was even a burst of gunfire at the scene. In such a situation of extreme instability, the Kosovo authorities immediately closed a number of "border crossings" with Serbia.

In the context of the sudden emergence of tension, the Government of Serbia has also shown great attention. Serbia's current President Vucic said in a speech that this is the most difficult situation that Serbia has encountered on the Kosovo issue, but the Serbian people will not surrender. He then strongly condemned the Kosovo authorities' attempts to package themselves as "victims" and expressed the hope that a settlement would be reached in the future through negotiations with the Kosovo side.

The situation in the Balkans is not stable? Vucic went to Kosovo to negotiate, and NATO's attitude was unusual

So two days after the incident, that is, on August 2, Vucic announced that he would go to Brussels, Belgium, on August 18 to hold talks with Kosovo's "Prime Minister" Kurtti, but he did not have much expectation of the outcome, in his opinion, any idea of maintaining long-term peace between Serbia and Kosovo has some ideas, Vucic is very clear, if Serbia recognizes Kosovo's status as an "independent state", Then the Serbian people will be very dissatisfied (and behind it is the surveillance of Serbia by the NATO group. )

Therefore, in order to express Serbia's position, Vucic also specifically stressed that "Kosovo is not an independent country": "Although Serbia will not launch a military offensive against the Kosovo region, because according to international law, Kosovo is part of Serbia." "Obviously, this is undoubtedly a rather uncomfortable statement for the NATO group, which has been observing the situation in the Balkans. After all, during the previous dismemberment of Yugoslavia, NATO warplanes bombed Serbia almost non-stop (air military support), eventually turning the Balkan Peninsula into a mess.

The situation in the Balkans is not stable? Vucic went to Kosovo to negotiate, and NATO's attitude was unusual

And all this is precisely the sin of the so-called "free" Countries of Western Europe (including, of course, the United States, which is far away on the other side of the ocean). However, what is different from before is that nato once became very inflated and uninhabited after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the collapse of the Soviet Union, but under the multiple factors of the US economic recession and the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in recent years, NATO's attitude toward Serbia and Kosovo has also changed significantly.

As the US-led NATO bloc began to fear another "large-scale local war" in the Balkans, Kosovo made partial concessions to the demonstrations and protests of the Serbs at the request of the U.S. government. On July 31, the Kosovo government announced that it would postpone the previously mentioned "ban" until September 1. And the U.S. ambassador to Kosovo, Jeffrey Hoviniye, also believes that because of the "misunderstanding" about the nature of the Kosovo government's policy, the United States "thinks" that the ban needs to be postponed (good guys, is it not at all disguised that the United States is now interfering in the internal affairs of other regions?). )。

The situation in the Balkans is not stable? Vucic went to Kosovo to negotiate, and NATO's attitude was unusual

However, the US ambassador also stressed that the US only asked the Kosovo authorities to postpone the implementation, and did not call for the direct lifting of the ban. Obviously, while diplomatically "pretending to be a good person," the United States has not forgotten to imply that Serbia "gives them a little favor." Unless Serbia can meet some of america's small needs in the Balkans in the future, the united states can also allow more bans against Serbs to be introduced, rather than postponed or canceled.

More interestingly, the KOSOVO Peace Implementation Force deployed by NATO also issued a statement on the situation, saying: "The NATO military is closely monitoring the situation and will be prepared to intervene in accordance with the authorization of the United Nations if the stability of the Balkans is threatened." "According to available information, the force entered Kosovo in June 1999 and currently maintains a strength of about 4,000 troops on the ground. Although it does not seem to have much military impact on the balkan countries, this force is only a "vanguard" after all. Who knows when NATO will increase its troops?

The situation in the Balkans is not stable? Vucic went to Kosovo to negotiate, and NATO's attitude was unusual

In any case, judging from the statements of the NATO bloc and the current situation in the Balkans, Europe in the future may be more unstable, and once there is another large-scale local war in the Balkans, The European economy is likely to be extremely seriously affected. After all, under the multiple influences of factors such as the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and the Balkan war, more and more industrial economies developing in Europe are likely to choose to flee to the United States and China, which shows that the future of Europe is likely to be even more bleak.

However, this is also the "fate" of the descendants of this group of colonizers, who let the developed economies of Western Europe, such as Britain, France, Germany and the West, once invade and colonize Asian, African, and Latin American countries and engage in genocide and cultural destruction?

Read on