On the afternoon of June 24, minnesota local time, Liu Qiangdong held an offline public hearing in the civil case of plaintiff Jingyao v. Liu Qiangdong, and the case had the latest progress.
Liu Qiangdong's lawyer found that the plaintiff Liu Jingyao was inconsistent in his statement in the process of evidence collection and was suspected of lying.
It seems that Liu Qiangdong responded to jackie Chan's big brother's sentence in marriage
刘强东是真脸盲，刘小姐其人
Liu Qiangdong said in response to a reporter's question in "Meet the Big Coffee":
At that time, many people felt that Uncle Dong had a kind of extreme Versailles. Similarly, Ma Yun also said in an interview with Xiao Sa:
However, on June 24, Liu Qiangdong's case, offline hearing, the heroine Liu Jingyao appeared for the first time through video connection.
This time, seeing the heroine herself, I believed that Uncle Dong was really blind.
Screenshot of the video of the hearing
The heroine looks like this...
Isn't that a bit of a disappointment?
Liu Jingyao personally appealed for punitive damages against Liu Qiangdong and JD.com.
Dongge these two minutes is really too expensive, this is Jingdong's public relations crisis recorded in history...
To this end, Liu Jingyao's own population will describe the following points:
1. At the banquet organized by JD.com, where she attended, she was frequently poured with alcohol.
2. In the car, Liu Qiangdong touched it.
3. The woman has always refused to touch it.
The fundamental purpose of these details is to point the sword at Liu Qiangdong and JD.com, and the purpose is money.
Screenshot of Weibo
It was really predicted exactly the same by Principal Wang, and he was distressed for a second.
Principal Wang deleted the blog soon after, but Principal Wang generally eats melons with a relatively high standard.
This time it was... Magically predicted...
However, the woman's testimony from the driver and the Japanese waiter was very unfavorable to Liu Qiangdong.
The driver said: In the car, jingyao was seen hiding in the corner. ”
But when asked if the driver thought Jingyao had been sexually assaulted in the car. He said he hadn't thought about it.
The testimony of the Japanese waiter was: "Jingyao was constantly drunk, his face was flushed, and he was obviously in a state of discomfort. Afterwards gave her a cup of hot tea. ”
These two testimonies were clearly against Dong ge.
But looking at the narration of Liu Qiangdong's testimony that flowed out, it is a bit intriguing.
Even if Dongge uses a very calm and conservative description, it is too different from Ms. Liu's elaboration.
Lawyer Liu Jingyaofang, the plaintiff, also proposed to add punitive damages to JD.com, and JD.com proposed a motion to exempt the employer from substitute liability.
检方提供的证据
The latest prosecution provided two pieces of evidence.
Video loading...
One is Liu Jingyao's exchange with the police after the incident, hoping that the police will participate in the matter and ask Liu Qiangdong for money.
Communication between the plaintiff and the police
However, the police made it clear that the matter was illegal in their state and was considered extortion, so the police gave her the contact information of Liu Qiangdong's lawyer.
The plaintiff had a conversation with relatives and friends about forcing the defendant to be private
The other is Liu Jingyao's chat history with friends and family. It clearly stated that it was necessary to lose money for private, even if it forced Liu Qiangdong to be private.
The purpose of this money is also too obvious.
女方的证词前后反复
In the case on August 31, 2018, the woman repeatedly told the police that she said that she had a voluntary relationship.
Liu Jingyao took a screenshot of the video in the police recorder
But just two weeks later, the woman said Liu Qiangdong forced her.
The difference between before and after is also too big.
Of course, it was precisely because of her inconsistent testimony that Liu Qiangdong escaped from prison.
On whether the woman refuses and voluntarily.
The woman once said that she was drunk a lot.
However, in the monitoring, the woman is very intimate to pull Liu Qiangdong, and takes the initiative to press the elevator, and the walking posture is not like a drunken look.
The most puzzling thing is that the woman waits for the elevator door to open, and the smiling invitation gesture is held.
For the inconsistent testimony, the plaintiff's response differed from the initial statement because:
The plaintiff recounted that when a police officer asked if she had been raped that day, her exact words were:
When asked what it meant not to be that kind of rape, she explained that it was not rape by force.
But the plaintiff's explanation was very different from the affirmation on the law enforcement recorder.
For example, two weeks after the incident, the plaintiff told the police that he was drunk, but after seeing the surveillance, he changed his mouth to say that he was lying.
He even began to say that he took the initiative to invite the man to the apartment, and later denied his testimony.
Ms. Liu later said she kept refusing, but the police and doctors found no injuries on her body.
In short, Ms. Liu has no reasonable explanation for the differences between the testimonies before and after.
She was so capricious that even third-party witnesses refused to testify on her behalf.
Therefore, in response to Ms. Liu's repeated testimony, the civil compensation she claimed, at least 50,000 US dollars, is really not easy to achieve.
案件其他疑点
There are also many other doubts in this case.
Many people do not understand that Liu Qiangdong is directly related to this case, why is JD.com affected?
JD.com has also tried to apply to set aside its alternative liability as an employer.
But it was rejected by the judge.
The reason is: Jingdong's international marketing director organized this gathering, and all the expenses were paid by JD.com. And Dongge's participation in such business gatherings to establish business relations is also a real business activity. ”
In fact, whether Dongge was designed by the woman or not, this matter is enough to be included in the warning case of JD.com.
Screenshot of Weibo
Many people are also concerned about the most direct victims behind this case, Milk Tea and her daughter.
Milk tea forgiveness
In fact, looking at the announcement of the husband and wife, Dongge admitted his mistake to his daughter-in-law very sincerely, the two reconciled, and the milk tea forgiveness ended.
Milk tea circle of friends
But privately, the circle of friends of milk tea has also been pulled out, and the bitterness in the tone is not difficult to see.
What is the truth of the matter for so long, I believe that the next hearing at the end of September will have a result.
Summary: Men still have to restrain their desires, rich as Dongge, not only planted a heel himself, but also dragged his Jingdong into the mire. Such a case should be loaded into the celebrity exception in the business case!
Do you think Liu Jingyao can win the case? For a $5 million claim, can she make a successful claim?
Reference Sources:
1.内容综合自明尼苏达州法院官网
2. Palm-sniffing video
3. The picture comes from the Internet, and the copyright belongs to the original author.