Yes, you read that right, here, I want to compare and talk about how I, as a father, bring a baby.
When the child was young, it was a little skinny and a little wild.
The walls of the home are painted with various lines, which is annoying.
So, in a very serious tone, I gave the little guy an order: no painting on the wall!
However, my prohibition is completely the child's ear wind, which has not played any role, and the walls of the home are still "smoke miasma".
After I scrubbed and couldn't stand it anymore, I called the child again to make the ban I had given before clear:
If you paint on the wall again, the paintbrush is confiscated and destroyed, and the wall is scrubbed clean by yourself!
The little fellow looked at the paintbrush with wary and distressed eyes, and then nervously looked at the huge wall, and finally, there was a hint of emotion.
Furthermore, I was satisfied with the results that followed. Although the repeatedly painted walls can no longer be restored to their original state, since then, the child has finally understood and implemented the fact that drawings can only be made on paper, not on the wall.
You see, a child who has just learned things understands that if you only say prohibition, only say that you are not allowed to do anything, this forbidden behavior has no meaning. Anyway, the big deal is the old pattern of "I did it, you get angry" without pain or itch.
Only clear consequences, clear pointing out, the child's improper behavior, to bear responsibility, the wall is dirty to scrub their own scrubbing, to be punished, the paintbrush that smears the wall is confiscated and destroyed. Children are really jealous.
Children understand the truth.
Looking back, we look at the news reported by the CCTV news client, the principle of bold body labeling, there are only principles, and then, the news suddenly stopped.
Now, instead of being this "little friend", see this prohibition that only says "no", do you obey?
How can the practical significance of this kind of principled thing be highlighted? Could it be that before this principle is introduced, can someone not know such a simple thing?
Is the meaning of the three orders and five affirmations simply repetitive? ——You really should use the repeating machine!
In fact, for this kind of behavior of modifying other people's health codes for non-epidemic prevention purposes, we have a perfect compensation and accountability system.
Let's say that this "red code incident" that repeatedly emphasized the ban was introduced before. The compensatory act of "scrubbing the wall" is to restore the health code of the person who was recoded. The accountability system of "confiscating paintbrushes" is to let the relevant personnel get off the horse.
Objective facts exist, however, and this situation, in the most formal news we have seen so far, is not mentioned at all. What exactly does this mean?
We must be clearly aware of the authoritative position of CCTV news clients in the media. To a large extent, the news released by CCTV can be said to have the practical effect of "issuing commanders".
Under such an effect, it is equivalent to a father giving requirements to his children, and the specific situation should be described in detail. If only half of it is said, and only the prohibited part is said, and there is no mention of responsibility or punishment, then, at least, in the minds of some people who originally had some other ideas, this kind of reporting is "lack of weight and two less", which may be an opportunity. After all, you are only talking about prohibition, and have you said how this situation will really occur again.
Prohibition is merely a principle. After the occurrence of prohibited acts, making amends and punishing them is a powerful and effective way to uphold the principles. If there is a principle and there is no method, then the principle is the hypocrisy of false emptiness.
After the principle is determined, only when the method needs to be further clarified and effectively communicated, can people who are constrained by the principle be able to have effective operational constraints, which can truly reflect the binding significance of the principle.
#官方: Never allow non-epidemic factors to code health#