The moment the United States provoked the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, it certainly did not expect that small Ukraine would have such a big appetite. Even if it has fallen into such a situation, Biden has signed and passed one aid bill after another to Ukraine, and it can be said that the United States is now tightening its belt to fight this "war of attrition against Russia." Zelenskiy was not soft on people, lying happily on the supply of foreign aid, dreaming of becoming famous in world war I.
But the sad thing is that since the beginning of the war, Ukraine has been like an unsupportable Afghan dou, and in the control of the war situation, it has not been able to borrow the east wind of Western weapons and has frequently lost its defense. Recently, Zelenskiy said in his speech that the Ukrainian army fought extremely hard in the area of North Donetsk, and in order to reverse the situation, Ukraine needed more advanced weapons.
It is understood that the Ukrainian side has always hoped that the United States can assist the multiple rocket launcher long-range system (MLRS), which can continuously launch rockets hundreds of kilometers away, which will be of great help to Ukraine against Russia. But this is obviously a very uncomfortable thing for Biden.
At present, this rocket artillery long-range system, after years of improvement, has become the mainstay of the US military system, the most advanced model is the "Haimas" high-mobility rocket artillery system. It is reported that Haimas has been tested for many years in actual combat, plays an important supporting role in the modernization of the US Army, can launch guided rockets equipped with GPS inertial guidance components, and if the Army tactical missile system is used, it will have the ability to strike targets 300 kilometers away.
Therefore, the United States is quite precious to this "housekeeper" weapon. Don't look at the US side in the arms market is playing hot, but it is still very cautious about the export of weapons of this magnitude, and there have always been many restrictions. Most of the countries that are thirsty for talents go with money and return empty-handed. If the US side really provides free of charge to Ukraine, it will inevitably make people stunned, can it really be "deeply affectionate" under hegemony? Soft rice and hard food, can you really grasp the military of a strong country?
However, contrary to his wishes, in the face of Zelenskiy's lion mouth, Biden returned to the White House on the 30th and hurriedly told the media that the United States would not send rocket systems to Ukraine that could reach Russia.
I have to say that Biden had a weekend, his speech was finally sharp, and overall, this sentence conveyed two meanings. On the one hand, Biden wants to tell Ukraine by refusing that there should be a limit to soft rice and hard food. Since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States has basically responded to the Ukrainian side, and even if it cannot respond, it will fight a tug-of-war and use vague words to make up for it, but this time it has shown extraordinary determination and revealed a hint of "abandonment" meaning.
On the other hand, Biden probably understands that Ukraine is not very capable, but it has a lot of eyes. Zelenskiy pays lip service to salvage the decline, but in fact he is in a hurry, wanting to use the advanced weapons of the United States to target Russia. If this idea succeeds, the long-simmering contradictions between the United States and Russia will be on the verge of erupting, but the current United States is obviously unable to withstand a direct conflict with Russia.
In response, Medvedev, vice chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, commented that Washington's decision was "rational."
Dangerous and dangerous, almost one step wrong for life. For a bottomless ukraine, Biden is really a bit overwhelmed.
Now Zelenskiy has completely pinned the life and death of the country on the United States, today is a long-range rocket, tomorrow will be what? Who do you want to fight with Russia this year, and who do you want to fight next year? How could the United States not understand that it was clearly seriously cultivating consumables, how consumables had killed red eyes, and actually began to rivet with full strength, fighting a war with a dead heart, not taking down Russia, and vowing not to give up.
It turns out that being generous is okay, but being poor is not. It is precisely because of the "pampering habits" and wrong guidance of the United States to Ukraine without a lower limit that the Ukrainian side has become more and more obedient and competitive. If this continues, I am afraid that there is still residual heat for Ukrainian consumables, and the United States will have to "pedal" first on the road of "anti-consumption".