laitimes

【CF】The transaction price of the exchange has ups and downs, whether you can consider adding the "insured price" setting

Hello, hello friends, I am your spirit fox sister.

As more and more high-value game props have poured into the exchange system, players have become a mainstream purchase channel to get started with various props through the game exchange system.

【CF】The transaction price of the exchange has ups and downs, whether you can consider adding the "insured price" setting

However, compared with the traditional game props purchase channel, there are still too many price fluctuations and variables in the purchase method of the exchange. This has led to many players always having a wait-and-see attitude when facing the props of the game exchange, and dare not start easily.

【CF】The transaction price of the exchange has ups and downs, whether you can consider adding the "insured price" setting

After all, no one wants to start when the price of the prop transaction is high, and they are worried that they will encounter the price "Waterloo" not long after buying a certain exchange prop, which is very bad. Therefore, in the context of this game, some players also ask whether they can launch some kind of "insulation" mechanism or corresponding "insurance" props for game exchanges?

About the exchange "hedging" mechanism

The so-called exchange "insulation" mechanism, as the name suggests, is that after the player purchases a certain exchange prop, if the transaction price of the prop falls sharply in the future period of time, then the "insulation" mechanism can be relied on to obtain some compensation.

【CF】The transaction price of the exchange has ups and downs, whether you can consider adding the "insured price" setting

Because of the universality of online platform shopping, I believe that everyone is certainly no stranger to this "insulation" mechanism. It is just that if this "hedging" mechanism is applied to the game exchange system, what problems should we solve and deal with?

Game analysis of the "insuring" mechanism

The first is the question of the establishment of the "insulation" mechanism of the exchange props, whether it is necessary for the player to obtain the "protection" of the "insuring" mechanism at a smaller cost, or the establishment of its own "insulation" mechanism for some of the more special props in the exchange?

【CF】The transaction price of the exchange has ups and downs, whether you can consider adding the "insured price" setting

Secondly, how long is the specific insurance time of the "insulation" mechanism? Too short to make sense, too long and unrealistic. In particular, the trend of the game of the transaction price of some exchange props often has little to do with time, mainly due to the greater impact of activities.

【CF】The transaction price of the exchange has ups and downs, whether you can consider adding the "insured price" setting

Therefore, Ling Fox Sister is wondering whether the so-called exchange prop "insulation" mechanism can be used as inspiration, set to if the exchange prop appears in the future game activities after purchasing a certain exchange prop, the player who already has the exchange prop can rely on the "insulation" mechanism to obtain some corresponding compensation.

【CF】The transaction price of the exchange has ups and downs, whether you can consider adding the "insured price" setting

Finally, about the trigger conditions of the "insulation" mechanism, the corresponding "insuring" props will trigger the insulation if the transaction price falls slightly, which is really unnecessary. Therefore, the trigger conditions or scope of the "insuring" mechanism is also a very debatable question.

(Under the palm fire)

Read on