laitimes

He is a double-edged sword in Manchester United, with his excellent passing? Is he bad?

Why is Manchester United's Bruno Fernandez a double-edged sword? Is he bad?

B fee is not bad, but his way of playing, comprehensive strength and ball quotient are not enough to serve as the core of the midfield of the giants.

Simply put, B fee has personal ability, but playing football has no brain, and belongs to the type of courage and strategy.

Such a player, personal martial courage is no problem.

As a result, B Fee scored and assisted in his first two seasons at United (40 goals and 26 assists in 80 games).

Even if the state declines this season, for the midfielders, the 13 assists in 10 games in a single season is not too bad.

He is a double-edged sword in Manchester United, with his excellent passing? Is he bad?

My green watchman is watching the ball and paying electricity, but I can also see that it is not that Fernandez can't move Manchester United, but that Fernandez does not have the core ability to lead the team.

Of course, Manchester United have many problems, C Ronaldo can not move, this is understandable, but what about B fees? It's a different topic entirely.

Players like B Fee are all-rounders in midfield.

He's fast, has a balanced left and right foot shot, has a high sense of scoring after plugging in, and can deliver good balls to his teammates at any time.

He is a double-edged sword in Manchester United, with his excellent passing? Is he bad?

However, the shortcomings of the B fee are also obvious, playing the ball is brainless, like to plug in, and the way of passing is too risky.

Pass well, it's a one-knife ball.

What are the consequences for United if the opponent is cut off?

Moreover, B Fee looks like he has good passing, but he does not have the ability to control the rhythm of the game.

He is more suitable for completing the impact in a large space, and once he needs a B fee to control the field, he has no choice.

Organizational scheduling? He won't because his big-picture outlook and ability to read the game is average.

He is a double-edged sword in Manchester United, with his excellent passing? Is he bad?

Of course, the B fee is not useless, and in the stage when the opponent is not familiar with the B fee, the B fee can score like a numb.

If you treat B Fee as a role player and equip him with a tactical center and an organized midfielder to activate him, he can also score goals.

However, the current Manchester United and Portugal team are obviously not such a configuration, and the B fee is getting worse and worse than before.

He is a double-edged sword in Manchester United, with his excellent passing? Is he bad?

To sum up, Bruno Fernandez is very capable of personal ability, but he is more like a role player who eats configurations.

Such a player cannot be the core, and it is a double-edged sword.

Use well, stab the opponent, not use well, stab yourself!

Which do you think is stronger, Fernandez or De Bruyne? Welcome to discuss together.

Read on