Recent
Some netizens found
On a short video platform
The account of "Jinan RentIng Well" often posts videos
Photograph the remains of multiple tenants
The name is "open blind box"
The agency employees after the tenant checks out
The cleaning process will be filmed as a video
And in the video, various items left behind by the tenant are disclosed
At the same time through the analysis of these items
Speculate on the possible career and personal stories of tenants
Someone in the comments followed the information he had posted
Go to the flesh of this girl (tenant)
In the comments section of the video
Some netizens also believe that the photographer has malicious speculation about women
Suspected of violating the privacy of tenants
If it is a tenant's house with a lot of garbage
Tenants can be contacted for cleanup
There's no need to post comments online
Some netizens think
Many of the videos posted by bloggers feature female tenants
Various malicious speculations about his living objects
Video titles are also always with
"The lady of the nightclub checked out to pick up leaks"
"Little beauty check out everything is strange"
"Female college students checked out and opened the door directly shocked" and other Bo eyeballs
There is a suspicion of playing pornography
Subsequently, the intermediary responded
Record the phenomenon of a tenant making a mess of the room after checking out
is a "normal behavior"
And after the lease is withdrawn, the right to use the house belongs to the landlord
It does not consider the video content to be an infringement of the privacy rights of tenants
Another company staff member said
The account that posted the video is the personal account of a colleague in the company
I posted it online just to record it
The company will also control it in the later stage
Lawyers say
Have such videos been suspected of violating the privacy rights of tenants?
The housing intermediary obtained the right to legally enter the private space of the lessee after the lessee returned the lease, and also obtained the right to dispose of the abandoned items of the lessee, and the property rights of the clean-up room items were discarded and destroyed as waste, if it was agreed in the lease contract or after obtaining the consent of the lessee, there was no impropriety. However, if it publicly discloses private items that can carry or embody personal privacy and personal information in the form of self-photography media, causing the public to improperly evaluate the tenant, it constitutes an infringement of the tenant's right to privacy and reputation.
Of course, in daily life, there will also be individual tenants do not use the house according to the purpose, do not maintain the integrity of housing facilities, etc., if the housing agency shoots scenes such as damaged facilities and equipment, littering of domestic garbage, etc., does not shoot items containing the name of the tenant, nickname and other information, does not leak the personal information collected by the tenant, does not shoot specific daily necessities involving personal privacy, can not make people contact with specific individuals, that is, can not be determined to infringe on the privacy of others.
In the view of Wang Shengsheng, a lawyer at Guangdong People's Times Law Firm, the handling of personal belongings left by tenants after checking out is originally the property freedom of the disposer of the housing intermediary, but if the housing intermediary deliberately publicly displays the room abandoned objects when disposing of it, and on the basis of providing some of the tenant's personal information in its possession, deliberately guides the public to spy on the privacy of the owner of the abandoned property, and imagines and excavates its personal information, such as occupation, which may bring the original tenant the risk of personal privacy and personal information being infringed , and even brings the possibility of infringing on their persons and property.
Zheng Jingjing, a lawyer who has represented the Hangzhou woman in the case of express delivery and rumored derailment, said that the intermediary company disclosed various items left by the tenant through video shooting, and analyzed the possible professional and personal stories of the tenant through these items, which is suspected of infringing on the personal privacy of the tenant, "but in the end, whether the infringement depends on the content of the specific items." ”
Lawyer Zheng Jingjing said that when the intermediary company analyzes the tenant's professional and personal stories in the video, if it maliciously innuendos, fabricates or uses insulting words, in the case of being able to identify the real identity of the tenant, this behavior is also suspected of infringing on the tenant's right to reputation, "If this leads to a large number of netizens in the comments, the intermediary and the netizens of the Internet storm need to bear the tort liability." ”
If personal privacy is violated
How do tenants assert their rights?
If the lessee is searched for "human flesh" on the Internet due to the information released by the housing intermediary, or if the people around the lessee form a negative evaluation of his personal reputation and personality based on the characteristics of the house he rents and the personal belongings left behind, resulting in damage to his right to reputation, the housing intermediary company shall bear civil liabilities such as eliminating the impact, restoring his reputation, and apologizing. At the same time, as network platform managers, network users who maliciously spread should also bear corresponding administrative liabilities and civil tort compensation liabilities.
Source: Guangxi Law Popularization