Recently, there was a video that first forwarded each other between the circles of friends, and then broke out on the Internet. You are not mistaken, it is the video of Tesla's accident at the second high speed of Beijing airport. It may be replaced by another brand of vehicle, which is a big deal, at best, a news alert on your mobile phone.
It is Tesla, and every accident can become a hot spot. For this alone, should Tesla reflect on this? Today, the second highest Tesla accident in the airport has changed from a vehicle with a sudden abnormal acceleration to a misoperation by the owner, with a change of one hundred and eighty degrees, and whether there will be a change in the follow-up is not known.
The owner's original words were, "Today, driving a Tesla on the airport two highway, the car suddenly accelerated to 170 miles, and then the brakes failed, hitting four cars, and finally the airbag was opened to retrieve a life." Subsequently, Tesla responded that it communicated with the owner himself to verify that the incident was caused by the driver accidentally stepping on the accelerator pedal, and has now assisted the owner in the vehicle insurance claim process with the approval of the owner.
It is not easy for car owners to shake the pot
I believe that everyone has basically watched the video of the second highway of the airport, and there are judgments in their hearts about what is going on.
Let's first talk about the objective facts, Tesla such new energy models, in fact, where you drive, how deep the electric door you stepped on, how many brakes you stepped on, how much steering strength, can return to the headquarters in real time through the cloud. In other words, if you really misoperate, dirty water may not be able to splash out.
Some of this information will help car companies optimize the control logic of the drive system, some can help car companies optimize the control logic of automatic driving, and some, such as NVIDIA, you drive out to help it map the city.
Of course, some car companies use these data to prove that the accident has nothing to do with themselves, and these car companies will not tell you about these things, after all, no one wants to be monitored by every move.
That is, based on these data feedback, Tesla can stand up at the first time to explain that most accidents have nothing to do with themselves.
The only problem is that such data is a trade secret, and it is difficult to be open and transparent, unless you really sue the judicial authorities, it is almost impossible to see the so-called "evidence".
Putting aside the above vehicle driving status data back to the transmission, Tesla is not responsible for this accident?
Ineffectual active braking system
It seems that it can not be completely certain, according to the owner's narration: "As a 30-year-old driver, the distance of nearly one kilometer has been stepping on the accelerator? ”
Running a kilometer at a speed of 170km/h takes about 21 seconds, and after the realization of the collision with four cars, and it can be seen in the leaked video that the driver has actually been doing evasive actions, before hitting the tank 300, there are also obvious maneuvering evasion actions.
While "stepping on" and avoiding, it is really difficult for the driver to stop the Tesla Model 3 that is close to scrapping.
21 seconds is fleeting for people, but there are plenty of events to adjust. In these 21 seconds, it seems that the model 3's active safety system has chosen to lie flat.
Tesla Model 3 is actually equipped with a standard active braking system, which is actually in the process of accident, the braking system should be prepared in advance, and the driver should be alarmed when a collision may occur.
Alarms give the driver more time to react to dangerous situations, while the advance preparation of the braking system allows for faster, and in some cases stronger, deceleration.
If the driver reacts in an emergency situation, but the braking force is insufficient, the system provides additional braking force to achieve the best target braking force to avoid collision.
That is to say, the active braking system should be less than three layers of safety blocking cables, namely brake system preparation, driver alarm, brake assist, from the video and results, it seems, maybe, probably, probably, Tesla Model 3 did not intervene in the work, at least did not dare to correct the driver's mistakes.
From the accident point of view, four cars crashed in turn, you want to say that this is a fake signal for media testing, we did not monitor it, this is a real four cars.
Can only say that the Second Highway accident at Beijing Airport really can't be handled by this Tesla Model 3, and you really don't work.