Beijing time on April 22, Liaoning men's basketball team and Guangsha finals of the second game will be played, as far as this game is concerned, I believe that most fans like me, feel that the game is really no suspense, then what is the suspense?
After watching the first game, combined with the gap in strength between the two sides, in simple terms, the victory or defeat depends entirely on the Liaoning team itself, Liaoning wants to win that can win, to say that this finals, what else let me care, that is only the problem of the attribution of fmvp.
The author has always felt that if a team wins the championship, it must give mvp to the best performer, but unfortunately, in the CBA, this is not the case, the CBA is not looking at individual performance, but the individual average performance quality index score in all the finals, and the championship player who ranks first in the score will be awarded the FMVP.
Performance Quality Value = Score - 2 points - 0.8 × 3 points - 0.3 shots× Free throws + 0.3 × Offensive rebounds + 0.2 × Defensive rebounds + 0.5× assists + 1.5 × steals + 0.7 × Blocks - 1.2 × errors
Maybe everyone will feel that the data should not be the most accurate standard for measuring players, but the calculation formula of this data is very unfair for guard players such as Guo Allen, often those inside lines, because of the high efficiency and fewer mistakes, so it will take a larger advantage, taking the first game of the CBA Finals as an example, Guo Allen 21 points, 7 rebounds, 4 assists and 2 mistakes, the performance quality value is only 6.9 points, lower than Fu Hao's 10.5 points.
I don't think the CBA is targeting Allen, but Allen is indeed the player who has been hurt the most by the policy, and I don't understand why the CBA always has to measure a player by the quality of performance, maybe this is the CBA's profession, now it can really be said that there is not much time left for Guo Allen's counter-overtaking, only 3 games, Allen cheer up
(Wen Hongkun to comment on sports)