On March 15, the Chengdu-based Daily Economic News published an article saying that Pan Changjiang said in a live broadcast in March that I had known the chairman of Moutai Liquor for more than 10 years, drunk him last night, and gave me pricing power. The market price of this Tiger Year Moutai is more than 40,000 cases, and it sells more than 20,000 cases by itself, and the winery will definitely lose money.
Because of this article, it has been on the hot search list. Pan Changjiang is also after the "Friendship of Pan Ga" has become the focus of people's attention, and it has once again been paid attention to.
After that, the media interviewed Pan Changjiang, who said that he had never said that he had drunk Chairman Moutai at all. The price of the wine is not a problem for me, because I have not gone outside to understand the price, only the price given to myself by the supplier. Next, he will file a lawsuit against the relevant media.
Since this hot search was initiated by the daily economic news, it has also become the main target of Pan Changjiang's lawsuit.
More than 20 days after the incident, Pan Changjiang commissioned a lawyer to file an appeal. On April 6, Zhang Dongguang, an account certified as Beijing Jingshi Law Firm, posted a statement pointing out that the Chengdu Daily Economic News had seriously damaged Pan Changjiang's reputation and reduced Pan Changjiang's social evaluation after publishing false content. Pan Changjiang's team also sent a lawyer's letter to the Daily Economic News for the first time, asking him to publicly apologize. However, the Daily Economic News did not do so, and Pan Changjiang has entrusted Zhang Dongguang to file a lawsuit.
After the content was released, Pan Changjiang forwarded it and said that he believed that the law would give a fair judgment.
Pan Changjiang's legal weapons are used very well, but the daily economic news is not frightened, but has the determination to confront Pan Changjiang to the end.
The Daily Economic News issued a solemn statement on April 6, pointing out that some self-media published information on the Internet that "Pan Changjiang will sue the rumor-mongers of the live broadcast incident", which has a negative impact on the company's reputation and will reserve the right to pursue legal responsibility. In addition, the company has submitted to the market supervision department on March 16 the relevant materials of Pan Changjiang's suspected false publicity in the live broadcast event, and the materials are being verified.
It can be seen that the daily economic news is really ready to fight with Pan Changjiang to the end.
From an objective point of view, I support the actions of both Pan Changjiang and the Daily Economic News. After all, the law is serious, as long as you think that the other party has violated your legitimate rights and interests, you can take up the legal weapon to protect yourself. As for who is right and who is wrong, the law will give a fair verdict.
Assuming that Pan Changjiang really did not say that he had known Chairman Moutai for more than 10 years, and that he had drunk and got a preferential price, then the daily economic news did have infringements, and there was no problem in publicly apologizing.
Assuming that the daily economic news holds a relatively solid evidence of Pan Changjiang's suspected false propaganda, then Pan Changjiang naturally has to accept legal sanctions.
Therefore, from a legal point of view, whether it is Pan Changjiang or the Daily Economic News, they have the possibility of winning the lawsuit, because what they are arguing about is not the same thing.
From the perspective of public opinion, Pan Changjiang is in the ascendant. Because Pan Changjiang lost to the "Friendship of Panga".
From an artistic point of view, Pan Changjiang has brought us many precious works of art, including: sketches, movies, TV series, etc. If he does not get involved in the field of live streaming, he can be respected as an "old artist".
I don't know why, after Pan Changjiang criticized the word of mouth of Gazi live broadcast with goods, he immediately threw himself into the field of live streaming with goods.
What is more ironic is that the field that Pan Changjiang entered is precisely in the category of gazi overturned wine.
Isn't Pan Changjiang not afraid of overturning? I don't think so, because as long as you often walk by the river, there are no shoes that don't get wet. As long as you have done a big anchor with live broadcast goods, you have basically overturned the car.
Since the rollover is certain, why should Pan Changjiang desperately throw himself into it?
The answer, of course, is the potential gains. At the peak, Wei Ya can sell more than 20 billion yuan of goods a year, even if Pan Changjiang only has 1/10 of the sales, it is 2 billion yuan. According to the gross profit calculation of 20%, the annual income is 400 million, which is higher than the income of first-line film and television stars.
What should I do if I encounter fake wine? The Pan Changjiang team definitely has this constraint in the contract with the supplier, which is the basic protection of themselves. At that time, it is only necessary to coordinate suppliers and consumers, and there will be no too serious legal liabilities.
When the risk is within the controllable range and the benefit is outside the controllable range, someone will definitely do this, why can't it be Pan Changjiang?
Please don't misunderstand, I just want to analyze why Pan Changjiang did this from my own point of view?
As for the mutual litigation between Pan Changjiang and the Daily Economic News, we just have to watch the drama, and the law will give a fair judgment.
This is the best of times, but also a worst of times, with the integration of capital thinking and innovative models, the whole world is your stage!
In the new business world, there are no eliminated industries, only eliminated products and outdated business models, and all commercial competition in the future will focus on product innovation and model innovation.
A company or a boss, if the shortage of innovation ability is doomed to lose in advance, remember that there is no innovation, where there is imagination!