There are more and more judgment defaulters, and the situation of untrustworthy people and the thinking of untrustworthy people are all different. The vast majority of untrustworthy people want to make a comeback, and the vast majority of untrustworthy people want to make money to pay off debts.
There are few untrustworthy people who do not want to repay their debts and evade debts. Most of the untrustworthy people are bold men, and few are willing to be shrunken-headed turtles and old ladies in the face of debt.
Debt repayment is basically the debtor, the only choice on the road to debt, the only goal.
Once the debtor enters the enforcement process, there are restrictions everywhere and there is no way to earn money. You have a man who has no money to earn, and there is some reality in talking about paying off debts.
Stereotyped as untrustworthy, they have generally entered the enforcement process.
Executors have basically been blacklisted and restricted from various channels of earning money, which makes debtors who really have nothing, want to repay their debts, but have no way to make money, because the way to make money is all sanctioned and restricted.
Black households, restricting high consumption, taking high-speed rail, leaving train sleepers, first class cabins. Children are restricted from attending high-fee private schools, restricting stays in hotels, and restricting high-end spending in hotels. Restrict buying a car, restrict buying a house.
These restrictions, I think, as punishment for the debtor, are reasonable and should be.
As a debtor, you can't always fail to pay off your debts, pay off your own days and wine, drive your own luxury cars, live in villas, and live a high-end life, which is indeed unfair to creditors, so these restrictions are not excessive.
Black householders, restricting the use of airplanes, I think if the debtor is going out to earn money, he should be able to explain to the court and give permission. The debtor can only repay the debt normally if he earns money, and the road is blocked, so how can the debtor make money, and how can he repay the debt without making money.
I don't think it's even more unfair to the debtor if you can't get a business license. The debtor's debt is generated, and the debtor's debt repayment is taken for granted. If you want debtors to pay off their debts, especially those who owe a large amount of debt, you don't let him go to business, how to pay off debts by working.
One-size-fits-all do not allow debtors to apply for business licenses, so that debtors have no way to earn money, there is no hope of making money, what benefits are there for both sides of the debtor, and what benefits are there for social stability.
In order to solve the debt problem, I think debtors should be encouraged to actively earn money. Moreover, depending on the actual debt situation of the debtor, the debtor should be given the actual method of earning money.
For example, those who owe tens of thousands owe tens of thousands of limit methods.
Owe millions of dollars to give different methods of restriction, owe millions or even tens of millions, you do not give her the opportunity to start a new business, he takes what to pay off debts, part-time work to pay back millions that is a fool to say that the dream is unrealistic.
To put it bluntly, it is obviously forcing the debtor not to repay the debt, leaving him to fend for himself. This is not a debt, it is a debtor who kills himself.
In my opinion, the restriction on the debtor not being able to register a business license should not be done at all.
This side leaves the debtor with nowhere to go, and this side makes the debtor pay off the debt. While putting the debtor like a dead end, he shouted at the old Lai who would not pay back the money.
Who can come out and say what to do with this part of the debtor. It is impossible to rob and steal, and there is no way left for the debtor, which is to force the debtor to lie down and do the old man's thrift.