Hello everyone, I'm Sicong. Long-term computer hang-up has been looking for which Android emulator hang-up good? Generally speaking, we use the simulator that is fast and smoother and saves computer resources, and we can open more than we can save resources, and the hang-up time is longer and more stable. At present, the MUMU simulator in the commonly used simulator does not have the multi-open function, so the multi-open player does not use the MUMU simulator, nor is it used as an object of comparison. Tencent mobile game assistant can be opened more, but the efficiency is too low can be ruled out.
Now we often use three multi-open hang-up simulators, lightning simulator, proms simulator and night god simulator. Recently, each emulator has also produced a new version, we will do a comparative test to share with you, tell you which Android emulator hangs up, this is also the basis for which emulator we recommend to use.
When we test, we will test the speed, CPU, memory, video memory, frame rate and other aspects of the simulator, under the same configuration conditions, a higher frame rate is a better choice. Multi-opening not only requires a large number, but also the fluency is also taken into account, otherwise it is useless to hang up only a few frames of card into PPT.
Below is a comparison of our test data for these three products in the same test environment. CPU: E5-2670, Memory: 32G, Graphics: GTX1050 (6G), WIN10 system.
Screenshot of lightning simulator 16 open test:
Night God Simulator 16 open test screenshots
ProMs Simulator 16 open test screenshots
Thunder Night God and Getaway Simulator Test Synthesis Comparison Chart:
From the above figure, we can find that the Night God simulator is completely backward in terms of CPU, memory, video memory and frame rate, and is completely unsuitable for use as an overopen.
The Raider Simulator and the Getaway Simulator are similar in terms of CPU, video memory, and memory usage. However, the speed and frame rate of the Escape Simulator performed better than the Lightning Simulator in the test, so the new version of the Escape Simulator led in terms of the fluency of the multi-open hang-up.
From the above comparison test, the new version of the escape simulator has shown certain advantages when it is 16 open, in order to resist the pressure test, we will open the escape simulator to 21, and the following is the comparison of the 21 open escape simulator with the previous three simulators each 16 open data.
From the above figure, it can be seen that the resources consumed by the 21 open of the escape simulator are indeed more than when the 16 open, but the resources consumed by the 21 open run simulator are actually much lower than the 16 open night god simulator, and the frame rate is also higher.
After comparing the performance of the Runaway Simulator 21 with the Thunderbolt 16 Open, it was found that in addition to the CPU occupation, the Runaway Simulator 21 was higher when it was opened, the other video memory occupation, memory occupation and the FPS performance of the game were similar to the 16-open Thunderbolt, so the Idle optimization was very good in the multi-open resource occupation.
Summary: According to these sets of comparative tests, if there is no limit to the script of the hang-up, then the computer now wants to save resources and run more smoothly to use the escape simulator, and the performance of the multi-open has indeed been against the sky, and it will be smoother to open it alone. Share the real and reliable way to make money by playing games every day, please give Sicong Game Studio a little attention to like and forward forward, thank you here!