In this round of La Liga, Real Madrid played away to Celta, in the game, Real Madrid won three penalties, and after the game was ridiculed by the pro-Barca media "Daily Sports" as: three shameful penalties! The referee helped bring Real Madrid closer to the title!
Let's analyze whether these three penalties are really "shameful".
The first penalty occurred in the 18th minute of the game, after The Millidon broke through, was knocked down from behind by the opposing No. 9 player, this Xiao Qiang thought it was a hasty foul, and this referee awarded a penalty I think is correct.
Real Madrid's second penalty, and the most controversial, was awarded a penalty after Rodrigo broke through and made physical contact with Murillo, and the referee awarded Murillo a foul and awarded a penalty. Before analyzing, let's take a look at a scene from this week's Bundesliga match between Freiburg and Bayern.
What do you think after watching these two videos? In both videos, the defender drops his leg in advance, and the player who breaks through behind is hanging on to the other side, and we think that the offensive player has expected this contact, so we think this contact is reasonable and should not blow fouls.
Real Madrid's third penalty, the defenders did hook the Real Madrid players, so the referee awarded a penalty I think is correct.
Of course, it is not only because the referee in this game caused such a big controversy not only because the referee awarded three penalties to Real Madrid, but also because one of the goals in Celta was also blown by the referee to be invalid, let's take a look:
In the 39th minute, Garland's cross from the left into the box garado's header was saved by Courtois and bounced into the net after being hit inside the post, before the referee reviewed and determined that Aspars' offside goal was invalid.
From the above picture, we know that in the moment of Gallardo's header, Aspars was indeed in an offside position. From the following picture, we can see that Courtois made a save, and Aspars's position did not affect Courtois's save or block its view, so At this time, Aspars should not blow offside.
When the ball hit the upright and bounced in the other direction, Arabba went to clear the line and Aspars went to scramble for the ball, but neither side touched the ball and the ball landed in the net. Earlier we said that Aspars is indeed in an offside position, but after the ball bounced back after hitting the upright, Aspars in an offside position did not touch the football, so there is no such thing as gaining an advantage in the offside position. However, Aspars was in an offside position to compete for the ball and really affected Alaba's ability to handle the ball, so It should still be awarded as an offside foul!
The most pitiful was Gallardo after the goal, the goal was blown invalid because of the offside foul of his teammates, and he was also warned of a yellow card for stripping to celebrate!
What do you think of these cases? Please express your opinion in the comment area!
Click Share
Click Favorites
Thumbs up