Release the latest emergency military information, broadcast global hot information, welcome to pay attention to the "Military Intelligence Bulletin"!
Since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, although there are two warring parties standing on the table, it is actually Russia and NATO that are competing. However, NATO seems to have a large number of people and a strong wealth and a strong army, but after this battle, people have seen the other side of it, that is, there are serious internal differences, all kinds of mountains are scattered, there are kings, there are wall-riding factions, there are hideaway factions, and there are bad factions... Through the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, people can finally see clearly: It turns out that you are such a NATO, no wonder you will be led by the nose of the United States, and it is no wonder that you will stop helping Ukraine and leaving one laughing stock after another in the international community.
Difference 1: Accept Ukrainian refugees, Britain and France pinch up
Since the outbreak of conflict, Britain and the United States have undoubtedly been the most active militants. Actively transporting weapons, sanctioning with a big stick, it is as if Ukraine is regarded as its own brother, shouting vigorously and exerting its strength. However, just now, the United Kingdom, which was eager to jump to the front desk, was exposed by France. French Interior Minister Dalmanin publicly criticized Britain for "fighting the war for more than ten days, but so far only 50 visas have been issued". Don't forget, the war you arched up has displaced millions of Ukrainian refugees. In response, British Prime Minister Johnson responded that "our system does not let people enter the UK casually, in fact, we have been very, very generous". Seeing this, Xiaobian just wants to say, you don't let people enter your own country at will, but can you casually provoke conflicts in other countries? Could it be that the so-called "English gentleman" is so generous?
Divergence 2: Aid to fighter jets, the United States and Bolivia disagreements
The U.S.-Poland twist on the warplanes to aid Ukraine has left the world in a state of shock. A few fighters, Poland did not dare to send, Germany did not want to turn, the United States refused to give, the same is NATO's "good brothers", but together played a game of playing leather ball. Since you are so afraid of a direct conflict with Russia, why not open a showdown, peaceful dialogue, and be easy to provoke but afraid of things, such an operation is really disgraceful. It is no wonder that such a group of guys will push Ukraine outside NATO to the front of the stage and fight with Russia. Therefore, if the tragedy in Ukraine is compared to a full moon, the "credit" behind it is really half of Ukraine and half of NATO.
Divergence 3: Energy sticks, Germany disagrees
While trying to avoid a hot war, NATO countries have launched a huge economic war against Russia, and energy sanctions are a very key move. As we all know, Russia is vast and extremely rich in energy, and if you cut off the energy trade between Russia and European and American countries, it will undoubtedly bring a lot of trouble to Russia. But for such a very powerful sanctions tool. Germany, the big brother of the European continent, has always raised its flag against it and insisted on maintaining energy transactions with Russia with practical actions. Germany's opposition not only embarrassed Britain and the United States, but also showed the differences within NATO on the table.
Divergence 4: Dialogue or sanctions, France has its own opinion
To tell the truth, in this conflict, France is still quite impressive. From calling for dialogue and opposing sanctions from beginning to end, to insisting on non-stop phone calls with Russia and Ukraine, French President Emmanuel Macron has in fact played the role of a mediator, unlike the British and Americans who "only care about the fire and ignore the consequences." In fact, since Macron came to power, he has advocated improving relations with Russia, until the first two days, Macron also publicly stated that "Russia and Russians must be respected." It can be said that these words and deeds show that France under Macron strongly wants to enhance its status as a great power and strongly advocates policy independence from the United States. Of course, such an assertive France has indeed become a "different kind" in NATO.
Divergence 5: Press the opposing button to avoid danger and seek self-safety
Among the NATO countries this time, the most "unsociable" performance is hungary. The country, which has deep ties to the former Soviet Union, not only refused to sanction Russia, but also made it clear that it would not send troops to Ukraine, and even would not allow NATO to send weapons to Ukraine across the Hungarian border. I have to say that Hungary's approach is very wise, as a country that has completed economic reconstruction with the help of the former Soviet Union and now has deep and extensive economic and trade exchanges with Russia, if Hungary follows the trend of other NATO countries, what consequences await him, Hungary thinks better than anyone.
A War between Russia and Ukraine has made people see the deep rift within NATO: Britain and the United States are the most radical militants, Germany is the most practical pragmatist, France is the most independent who wants to make a difference, and a number of small countries are settlers who no one wants to offend. In the face of such a NATO with its own heart, Ukraine actually wants to squeeze its head into it and give the United States and the West an extra pawn for people to die. Such Zelenskiy, compared with Hungary, is really a complete confusion, a person awake.