The 75 biggest stars have recently become a hot topic of discussion among fans, with most of the inductees appearing at the All-Star Game and taking big group photos. Some people are selected, naturally some people are not selected, and it is highly controversial, including the very popular McGrady and the once invincible center Howard, the many-time championship winner Ginobili, and the best defensive player Green. And after the author saw maddy lose the election, his heart was also angry, because there was no collective honor should not actually be used as the selection criteria for the 75 superstars, and Iverson also did not have it, but it did not prevent Iverson from being selected.
I saw an article published by the media on the Internet entitled "Maddie: Why did Lillard be selected as one of the 75 superstars and I failed?" It's the NBA's biggest joke", was deeply attracted by the title, because of seeing Maddy respond, and pointing out that Lillard, who also had no collective honor, was selected as a joke. I thought Maddie really responded, and I believe that other readers see this title and feel the same way. The author also very much agrees that Lillard's selection is the biggest joke, if Lillard can, why can't Maddy?
The author finally consulted most of the information channels carefully, and did not find the source of Maddy's response at all, and initially judged that Maddy did not really respond, and would not point out Lillard's name in this way. In short, this article belongs to the title party, but there are still a few personal opinions on the topic of Lillard's selection of the top 75 superstars. First, Lillard is not a talented player, basically all rely on the efforts of the day after tomorrow, which is very different from Maddy. Maddy is a basketball genius, all kinds of hard-to-replicate dry projection is easily completed, playing depends on talent, this innate advantage can not be ignored, if in a sport, the player who successfully cashed in the talent is still ignored, it is really very unfair.
Second, Lillard has always been in his comfort zone, ostensibly loyal, but in reality not having the courage to challenge his limits. As we all know, Lillard has a championship dream, as long as he wants, in fact, he can join the Lakers, James will definitely help Lillard realize his dream. But Lillard hasn't done that, even though the Blazers have twice replaced all of his good teammates. To put it bluntly, Lillard worked hard enough, but his ability to lead the team was questioned. Maddy, on the other hand, is a supergiant who can turn weak teams into strong teams, which is difficult to do, and it cannot be measured by whether he has successfully won the championship, and his ability to lead the team is far better than Lillard.
Third, how should Maddy's peak level be measured? The author believes that Maddy's peak period is indeed not too long, but the peak state can definitely be compared to James, Iverson and others, which is the most inexplicable existence in the league. And Lillard seems to have been unable to reach such a level, his big heart kill is indeed very powerful, and his comprehensive ability is also worthy of the title of super giant, but he has not shocked the entire league like Maddy. Fourth, Maddy's influence is incomparable to Lillard, how many fans are crazy for Maddy, Lillard is insurmountable. So, even if Maddy doesn't respond to the 75 superstar, the fans will still speak out for him, and we should not disparage Lillard too much, he is also a good player, and I hope that he will recover from injury as soon as possible to prove that he deserves to be one of the 75 superstars.