In the final of the men's slope steeplechase competition previously held in the snowboarding men's slope obstacle course, Chinese teenager Su Yiming was a blockbuster, and at the age of 17, he created the best result in the project for China; among them, he completed the only 1800-degree aerial turn in the whole field, surprising everyone, and finally won a high score of 88.70, but he was helpless to beat max Parrote in the first place, and won the silver medal, which was also China's first medal in the project.
After the game, there were two voices on the Internet, one was that Su Yiming's score was low, after all, he had completed such a difficult action as 1800 air turns, and the score given by the Swedish referee and the Canadian referee was low in the scoring; one was that the champion Max made a mistake when jumping on the stage, and his hand did not grasp the skateboard, and there was a problem with the penalty here.
Of course, for ourselves, Su Yiming undoubtedly helped China break the record of 0 medals in the project, and everyone sent congratulations; but foreign netizens have quarreled, especially Canadian netizens, who believe that Max has made mistakes in the jumping project and should not get such a high score.
In addition, the runner-up winner Mike has many fans in Canada, and these fans have complained about Mike, after all, the latter has won the third place for two consecutive years, and this time he should have broken through to get the second place, but he was mistakenly scored by the referee, so he bombarded the referee on social media.
As a result, the referee of the project, a Canadian, admitted in an interview with the media that the winner Max scored higher. He said that in the referees' replay angle, he did not see the Canadian players catch the board mistake, and when they realized the mistake, the score had been submitted. According to the rules, Max should be deducted 3 points; after deducting these 3 points, Su Yiming should be the first, and max, who is also a Canadian, the bronze medalist Mike should be second, and Max should be third.
The referee is really ridiculous, after playing the score, he knows that there is a problem with the score given, why not announce it after the end of the game? Have you been under pressure to announce this matter when public opinion is upset? If foreign netizens do not vigorously denounce this matter on social media, is it that the matter has been sealed with time? It's ridiculous! In this case, where is the concept of fairness and justice in the Olympic Games?
For Su Yiming, this matter is very regrettable. Although we can file a complaint, the result is irrevocable and the 17-year-old cannot regain the gold medal! However, Su Yiming showed a big pattern, after the game said that he was very happy to get this score, he would not care too much about the score, he cared about his actual play on the field, and he would also try to remove the flaws in the action, and then prepare for the big jump project.
For such professional athletes, they will definitely see that there is a problem with the action of champion Max in the post-match review, but he did not stand up and speak out, did not express his injustice in order to gain public opinion support, no wonder netizens will say "the small plug pattern is too big"! I hope that Su Yiming can continue to play an excellent role in the next big jump project, and I also hope that the referees can have a golden eye and not make another wrong judgment.