On the evening of March 24, Nike's statement was pulled out, and the dense English text was explained in large vernacular
"I don't use it, and the suppliers I work with are not allowed to use it."
A bit of operation, completely angered netizens:
The incident quickly fermented with uncontrollable barbarism, and as a former Nike fan, it was inevitable to be confused:
"What happened to Xinjiang cotton?"
The most discussed is Douban, and the explanations are also different:
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="17" > the front-line Global Times report is clearer, the media in the "H&M boycott of Xinjiang cotton to provoke public anger, dig deep behind the Adineq and other international big names!" Referring to H&M's statement on the 24th:</h1>
The H&M Group's statement on due diligence in Xinjiang said H&M Group was "deeply concerned" about reports from civil society organizations and media reports, including allegations of "forced labor" and "religious discrimination" against ethnic minorities in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. H&M does not cooperate with any garment manufacturing plant located in Xinjiang and does not source products/raw materials from the region, the statement said. ”
A few sentences I read many times, trying to parse the following is: "We did resist, but the reason we resisted was to protect the enslaved working people?? ”
Is that what it means???
Of course, the article mentions another layer of relationship, cotton quality issues, involving a BCI China project team, probably the audit party, the audited party, the audit standard problem, and in the end is a party verification "never found a case of forced labor incident." ”
and no quality issues???
In the chaotic operation, a mysterious operation is explained: "Do not rule out the possibility of self-detonation and speculation, and use public opinion to cut leeks? ”
Do you know more about cause and effect? Message area under popular science.
Finally, I have to share a russell's words: knowledge is power, conscience is direction.
After reading the whole report, I was very touched by a message about what they called the enslaved?
If you are really enslaved, can you resist them and be freed? Haven't you worked harder in a different place?
Who is redeeming who is not liberated from the source, who is doing "cutting and giving alms" by prejudice and God's perspective?
There is a saying in "On China" that "China is always protected by their bravest people." ”
The discriminator is also the discriminated against. The incident is still fermenting, CCTV is also off the scene, and we are waiting for an echo here.