To be honest, I didn't really want to write this article or mention the name. However, seeing some articles, such as fish in the throat, I feel that it is necessary to write it. I have never chased hot spots, because the more hot spots, the easier it is to lose the truth, and if I am not careful, I will become someone else's "tool".
Regarding the matter of Liu Mouzhou, I just looked at it and felt sorry in my heart. However, some articles, after reading, make people feel that the problem seems to be becoming more and more complicated, and even have a tendency to "internationalize". They seem to want to lead this matter "deeply" into it. And the many "praises" in the message make me feel that there is indeed a need to write.
Yinuo (image from the Internet)
Yinuo's "slave society", for such a "hot spot", of course, will not miss the voice. On January 25, Yinuo published an article entitled "Look at Liu Mouzhou, you will know how this society treats children". In this article, of course, it is a detailed enumeration of our problems, showing how our "people at the bottom" are ignored.
In the article, "The United States of America" naturally appears. "In the United States, for example, each state government has a special child service welfare department, including a child abduction response department, a child abuse reporting hotline, a child abuse prevention office, an adoption office, a substitute service department, and so on."
Then, it is about how the United States carefully protects the rights of every child. "All the government bears the cost", this sentence appears at least 3 times in the article. In this way, we seem to be in hell, and the United States is like heaven. And Liu Mouzhou's departure is entirely the result of the inaction of our "relevant departments.".
In "One Garden 8" (already 8?) On January 26, the article "Yu Silent: There Are Thousands of Kinds of Suffering in the World, but the Saddest Is Liu Mouzhou". The article first "analyzed" various reasons, and then, through the upcoming Winter Olympics, listed some "special" athletes, which also led to the United States.
They were taking in our children as early as 100 years ago. According to the data of the U.S. Embassy in China, since the 1980s, American families have begun to adopt a large number of abandoned babies in China, and more than 100,000 have been adopted so far. Many of them are baby girls and babies with disabilities. Finally, the article ended with a cry to "save the children."
The two articles are "invariably the same" approach, as if they were written by one person. We are the "world of suffering", and the United States is a "beautiful paradise", which is the impression that these two articles give me. If I had read something like this three years ago, I would have believed it. But now, such an article can only make me "hehe" laugh.
The reason why I saw these two articles was actually that I intentionally searched. I search for them because I know they will have a "unique point of view". The reason why I know that they have a "unique point of view" is because of the "public welfare people" Chen Xingjia and Fang Fang. Yinuo is a friend of "public welfare person" Chen Xingjia, and a garden is "specially appreciated" by her because she is always the "voice" of the publisher.
Chen Xingjia Yinuo (image from the Internet)
Sure enough, their articles are full of "compassion for the people at the bottom" and full of dissatisfaction with us. And the United States, like a mirror, reflects our flaws and deficiencies. I was a little curious, since they think that the United States is so good, why should they stay with us and not leave? Wouldn't it be better to go over there? Why can they stay here?
Do they want to "suffer" with us? Want to "help us"? Want to "enlighten" us? They did look at us with a condescending posture, "cold eyes". But for their routines, it is estimated that fewer and fewer people will believe, the facts are there, and the daily data is clear. Of course, they will still "spare no effort", as long as there is a chance to jump out, we have the right to watch it as a joke.
As for some media that chen xingjia, a "public welfare person", called "conscience media", neither article explicitly mentioned it, which is indeed "a bit interesting".