They are unstable, so they are anxious to be stable. Sure enough, if it can be stable, it is to make up for it. What this Ding netizen said makes a lot of sense. However, anticipation is psychological, and nature is important. The question is how to stabilize the mind? Stable reform and opening up can be completely stable. Otherwise, how stable is also unstable. Looking back a little, those who have been proposed to be stable are not all brought about by reform and opening up? Before the reform and opening up, there was none of this, and it was impossible to talk about stability at all. The reason is very concise. Some people say one thing in their mouths, but in fact they do a set, and perverse practices emerge in an endless stream, how can they be stable? [Prayer] [Prayer] [Prayer]
(His statement is as follows.) It seems that he is also trembling when he writes a microblog, and he also wants to quote the highest remarks to maintain his own stability, and also to say that there are no unpatriotic people, so as to define himself as patriotic. Saying this is like walking on thin ice, what else is there to say? How come there are no unpatriotic people? Which country doesn't? It's just how to define patriotism. During the War of Resistance Against Japan, both the Chongqing Central Committee and the Nanjing Central Committee said that they were the most patriotic. Who loves the country and who is not patriotic is not how to flaunt it, or the people have the final say, and time will verify. [Nose picking] [Nose picking] [Nose picking])
In the "six stability" of "stable employment, stable finance, stable foreign trade, stable foreign investment, stable investment, and stable expectations", I personally feel that "stable expectations" is the most important. If there is no confidence in the future, no one dares to invest, no one dares to consume. However, the "stable expectation" is far from enough to have technical actions, and it must be reconstructed and sincerely practiced from the source of the concept: first, stabilize reform and opening up; second, stabilize Sino-US relations; third, stabilize the market economy; fourth, stabilize the team of entrepreneurs; and fifth, stabilize the rule of law. At the same time, we should also seriously reflect and profoundly sum up: Why can't editorials appease people's hearts, but Li Guangman's flawed online article scares society into a panic; why is it that the field of public opinion is often 404, but Sima Nan and the like, who run counter to the central policy, can make waves? History has long shown that the work of the world can only be created in the process of advancing, not in retreat.
"Reform and opening up is a great awakening of the party" and "a key move to determine the fate of contemporary China." On this cold day, re-reading the above golden sentences, I sincerely feel that "there are high-ranking people in the party" and sincerely look forward to a higher level of "reawakening".
The ground beneath our feet is deeply rooted in our roots.
So, if someone asks me:
Is there anyone who is unpatriotic?
My answer is: No!
Good luck, China; good luck, people!
