Richard III – A tyrant who loved his people like a son

Richard III was truly an enigmatic figure in British history.

Richard III, the last king of the York dynasty

Richard was the younger son of Richard, Duke of York. During the reign of his elder brother Edward IV, Richard was the most important general in the Yorkist war to defeat the Earl of Warwick; he was later made Duke of Lorost, and was also very competent in managing northern England and handling Scottish affairs. At the time of Edward IV's death, the Duke of Gloucester was elevated to the rank of "Protector of the Nation" as the chief minister of the Horst. Faithful, like the Duke of Zhou. Who expected that after the two young lords died violently at the same time, the situation took a sharp turn for the worse, and the Protector declared the marriage of the previous king illegal, thus overthrowing the family of the queen consort Woodville and eventually usurping the throne. Ferocious and ruthless, and like the recklessness of Anhan.

The Tudor literary master Shakespeare portrayed Richard III as a fierce thug in his historical drama. But in the past two years, historians have a new understanding of Richard III.

Historians comb through the judicial and fiscal records of the time and find a large number of historical records of Richard III's active judicial and tax reforms after his reign. Richard III was probably the first king in English history to value commerce. He was particularly interested in trade with the northern Italian region. Trade was based on an open and fair judiciary, for which he enacted many laws for the benefit of the people, paid judges a fixed salary, similar to a high salary, and reformed the parole system, all of which infringed on the interests of the great nobles and thus offended a large number of high-ranking officials and nobles.

It is not surprising, then, that the English elite quickly abandoned Richard III. The Remnants of Lancaster, the Remnants of the Earl of Warwick, and the Woodville Renegades, three forces that could not have been fought together, united and revolted under the predominantly son of henry, the illegitimate son of the former queen. In the Battle of Bosworth, the Wang army obviously had a clear numerical advantage, but Henry's stepfather Stanley had a heavy army but the first two ends, which directly led to the fiasco of the Wang army, and Richard III was given the head of the battle, laughing for the world.

After the death of the first king, the Woodville family committed a crime, the uncle of the Earl of Rivers flew high, and the protector decisively intervened to correct the chaos, and then the hearts of the people added to the yellow robe, unfortunately encountered the villain's conspiracy to die in battle. Looking at the truth, if Shakespeare is such a screenwriter, perhaps it is more in line with historical facts?

It's Jefiyah, and who knows?

The inscription is the ancient battlefield of Bosovos