Although the broadcast review of national comics is relatively strict, to ensure that the overall values are correct, the protagonist can not be a person with three views, but people who often watch anime will certainly not be completely limited to the national comics broadcast on the copyright platform, and will also watch some other anime.
In other animations, because of the lack of platform review, there will be some animations that are not so positive in the three views, and even for a period of time, the domestic copyright platform has also broadcast some animations that are not so positive in the three views.
So, if an anime is considered to be "three views are not correct", should it be completely banned?
I don't think so.
01. What is an anime with three views?
Everyone's understanding of the anime of "three views is not correct" is not exactly the same.
Some people understand that the "three views are not correct" anime is inconsistent with the mainstream values of reality, even if it is an anime with a historical background, it must be evaluated from the current point of view.
For example, some literary works that are now hailed as classics, some of which take place in the present, can definitely be regarded as "three views are not correct".
Some people understand that the anime of "three views is not correct" is an anime that does not conform to their own three views.
For example, the male protagonist is brilliant, but has a little stain, and in the eyes of some people, it is not correct.
It is precisely because everyone has a different definition of "three views of the wrong" anime, so every anime may become an anime in the eyes of some people.
The anime that I understand as "three views are not correct" is that a character in the anime does something obviously incorrect, but it has to be said to be the right thing by the anime.
If something is done incorrectly and punished for it, the overall values of the work are not problematic.
02. Should it be banned altogether?
In the past two years, there has been a trend of two extremes in the evaluation of anime, people who like it, see all the advantages, people who don't like it, see all the shortcomings, and even hope that anime is banned.
As mentioned earlier, everyone's three-way evaluation of anime is different, and some people may like anime characters, but in the eyes of others, they are not good people.
Therefore, many anime that are considered to be "three views are not correct" should not be completely banned, of course, this does not include some anti-human anime, anti-human anime should not be made.
Why are so many anime in China banned?
This is because the domestic video platform does not have a perfect rating standard for animation, even if the audience positioning 18+ animation, can not prevent the audience under 18 years old from seeing, so it will limit the playback.
For a person who has his own three views, he can distinguish whether the three views of the anime meet his own standards, even if it is crooked, the impact on himself will not be too big.
However, many small viewers' three views are not completely established, and they can easily mistakenly think that some of the three views in the anime are what they look like in reality, and then they are affected.
Therefore, how to let the right audience see the right anime is the problem that should be solved.
Some anime that everyone thinks is "three views are not correct", compared with some confusing things in reality, it is simply a small witch.
I think that we should let anime return to anime, let the three views of anime stay in anime, and should not completely negate an anime because of a certain shortcoming of an anime.
What do you think?
This article is originally published by Toot Toot National Comics, only represents personal views, if you have different views on anime, welcome to the comment area to exchange and discuss.