It is said that a few days ago, Prince Andrew was "removed" from the British royal family for being deeply involved in sexual assault lawsuits, which became the focus of global attention.
In the past two days, Harry Meghan once again rushed to the front "without hesitation" and diverted the public opinion cannon fire.
Harry is said to have threatened legal action because he was unhappy with the government's removal of his security measures in Britain, and he has sent a "pre-action agreement" letter to the Home Office, threatening to "continue to seek judicial review if he does not return the bodyguard to him"!
< Harry threatened to sue the British government: give me back my bodyguard >!
As a result, this matter has not yet ushered in a follow-up, and Harrie Meghan has ushered in a new controversy in the past two days...
Recently, according to media reports, Buckingham Palace officials are now considering how to remove Andrew and Harry's role as state advisers!
Under the Regency Decree promulgated by the United Kingdom in 1937, the spouse of the monarch and four heirs over the age of 21 served as state advisers, and if the Queen was unable to perform her duties due to illness or abroad, they would be authorized to take over the Queen's position to perform most of the official duties, including signing important documents, attending Privy Council meetings and receiving the credentials of the new Ambassador to the United Kingdom.
The current four state advisers are Prince Charles, the first in line to the throne, and Prince William, the second in line, while the other two are Andrew and Harry, who have been stripped of their royal and military titles.
Although the process of pushing this unprecedented matter must go through a bill of parliament to be achieved, the whole process is quite cumbersome, but a source revealed to the media that "this is the real problem that the royal family is seeking to solve":
"Imagine if the Queen were sick and Prince Charles and Prince William happened to be abroad, and Prince Andrew had to sign the official documents?
It is no exaggeration to say that this could well put the monarchy in jeopardy! ”
In addition to the possibility of being stripped of another character title, Andrew and Harry recently had to "lose" a medal that symbolized the highest honor!
At the upcoming 70th anniversary of the Queen's reign on 6 February, the Platinum Jubilee Medal will be awarded to those working in the public service in accordance with British tradition.
These include representatives of the armed forces, the emergency services and the prison service, as well as members of the royal family with honorary military titles who are also eligible for the award.
But Andrew and Harry, who were supposed to be on the list of awards, have now lost their military titles, so they are not eligible for the Platinum Jubilee Medal this time, which is really embarrassing...
Then, not long after the news came out, the royal expert Phil Dampier said that Harry Meghan had released the wind, and the couple was likely to make a decision not to return to the Uk for the 70th anniversary of the Queen's reign for safety reasons!
If this is the case, then the two sons will have to think clearly, after all, the queen is now elderly, and not returning this time means that their children will probably never have the privilege of seeing their great-grandmother again.
But in fact, in addition to the queen, Prince Charles also felt uncomfortable about it.
Prince Charles is said to have invited Harry's family back to england to live with him, hoping to see his young granddaughter Lilybet, who has not been seen since she was born in June last year.
And the proposal for the family's first reunion since Harry Meghan's decision to resign from the royal family was made as early as last Christmas Eve, but Harry refused to return on the grounds that he had not received high security from the Metropolitan Police.
However, according to sources, after the "reunion plan" was foiled, the royal family did not give up, and continued to actively communicate with Harriemegan by phone in the past two months:
Prince Charles regretted not being able to live with his grandchildren, and he really missed the time when Prince Archie was still in England.
He enjoys the role of grandfather, and it can be said that he feels that something is missing in his life, in fact, he can't get along with Harry's children.
That's the problem he's hoping to solve, and why he's sending out an invitation, saying that if Harry Meghan and the kids want to go home for a while, it's best to stay with him..."
In any case, the royal family refused to budge on Harry's threats of security, with former Royal Operations Force Commander Dai Davies pointing out that the Queen had no intention of "giving in" to his demands:
"It was Harry's privilege to choose to go to the United States in the first place, so when he decided to return home, he should no longer expect the government to provide him with bodyguards!"
Because our role is to ensure that physical surveys are carried out through various security agencies, assessing the risk level of each member of the royal family, and Harry's risk level is considered to be very low, which determines that we will not protect him.
If he feels in danger when he arrives in England, the Metropolitan Police will naturally be responsible for keeping him safe..."
Seeing that Harry was going to suffer "double humiliation", Meghan did not move for a while, but one of her journalist friends Mimid Scobie compared Harry and Andrew in front of the media, which seemed to be a bit of a rubbing heat:
"Prince Harry simply wanted his family to be freed from an unhealthy environment, but received no sympathy and support within the 'palace walls' of the royal family, and as a result was publicly deprived of all his previous achievements and royal privileges before stepping out of England!"
But after the disastrous BBC interview in November 2019, Andrew, who was exposed to the sexual assault scandal, was dealt with for a full 26 months before he was finally stripped of his title.
For us melon-eating masses, the 'protective circle' around Andrew has always been very confusing, especially when you compare his treatment to Prince Harry!
The royal family has long said that it needs to reflect modern moral norms, but after the 'conceited prince' Andrew was exposed to having done that kind of excess, he was treated differently just because he did not challenge the monarchy system like Prince Harry, which is obviously a royal problem! ”
But netizens who will pay attention to the remarks that this reporter wants to make, all of them are just comments on the royal family's removal of Andrew and Harry's role as state advisers this time:
"What a humiliation, that's what they deserve!"
"They didn't hesitate to humiliate the queen with selfishness, so now it's their turn to take their own chances!"
"Of course they are not worthy to be state advisers, and this role should be entrusted to Princess Anne and Prince Edward!"
"Even the State Counsellors, they should be excluded from the list of succession to the throne!"
"This is one of the smartest moves the Queen and The Uk has ever made!"
"What a good news that inspires the whole country!"