Since the "14th Five-Year Plan" made it clear that after the implementation of the gradual delay in retirement, the personnel in service heard the news and boiled over for a while.
People who are about to retire soon, I feel that this is not easy to get to retirement, and there is a delay in retirement, is this not that we have to pay more? How many more years do you have to pay yet?
The post-80s and post-90s who are working also lament that life is too difficult. After the 80s, it is difficult to go to school, it is difficult to buy a house, and it is difficult to retire. There are even many young people, because they can't see hope for social security, so they think about not paying, and if they pay again, there is no head, afraid that the more delayed the later, they will not receive a pension.
Therefore, many young people now do not have a strong awareness of paying social security, and if they can pay less, they will pay less, and if they can not pay, they will not pay. Nor is it so positive.
Therefore, as soon as the news of delayed retirement came out, it touched everyone's heart. Because this is really related to their vital interests.
So delay retirement, delay one year every 5 years, what do you think?
For delayed retirement, is it not directly delayed by 5 years, for example, female employees retire at 50 years old, delayed to 55 years old, male employees retire at 60 years old, delayed to 65 years old.
In fact, it is not like this, it is flexible retirement, classification advancement. That is to say, the high probability is to delay one year every 5 years, so if the delay is 5 years, it will take 25 years, that is to say, it will take 25 years of transition period. It is not directly to postpone the statutory retirement age by 5 years. A process is required, in small steps, delayed every year until it is delayed by 5 years.
For the current policy, the plan is to delay by 2 months per year, which means that by the time the delayed retirement is implemented, you are 60 years old and have reached retirement age, but you need to delay it by 2 months to retire. In the second year, it is delayed by 4 months, and the fifth year is delayed by 1 year, which is a way to advance.
So for retirees in 65 years, 70 years, 75 years, after the implementation of delayed retirement, everyone's retirement age is different.
So are you satisfied with the 5-year delay in retirement?
In fact, this problem cannot be generalized, because everyone's job position and position are different.
For public institution personnel, they are very happy to delay retirement by 5 years. You can work in a relaxed position for 5 years, get a salary for 5 years, and get a pension after retirement. So for this part of the group, they are more willing.
But for flexible employment personnel, they pay social security and grass-roots workers in enterprises, they are unwilling, doing hard work, they can not retire early to receive pensions, but also pay for several more years, pay social security for several years at their own expense, they themselves are miserable, why talk about the hope of delaying retirement? Can't find a job, don't say, find a job is also a hard worker, wait for 60 years old, which unit can want it? Therefore, they all suggest that it is more reasonable to retire according to the length of service, or to implement the old method of the elderly and the new method of the new person. What do you think about that?