laitimes

The distant savior, I can't understand it all over again

author:Joe was very helpful to the Lord

No culture is really terrible, even a yellow paragraph can not understand, never understood what Xiao Yawen said: "Singer, the voice of love also." The voice of the brother is a song, and the voice of the brother is also a song." What is the meaning. Am I too pure or too stupid?

I have watched several clips of "Heavenly Path" in today's headlines, and it is very mysterious, which scares me that I have not dared to watch a TV series, and I am always worried that an episode of a TV series needs to be watched repeatedly for a day. Finally plucked up the courage to buy the original work, many bridge sections repeatedly watched and deliberated, or could not understand. For example, Wutaishan Ding Yuanying and the master discussed, the interrogation room Rui Xiaodan's dialogue with the criminal, and Ding Yuanying's true words after being drunk twice. It seems that my understanding is too poor...

For people like me who struggle to give themselves a screen name, I like to study the names of the protagonists in the book. The name Ding Yuanying is very good! In my own simple opinion, interpret the name of the male protagonist:

Ding: It should be the simplest surname, the male protagonist's life in the ancient city is very simple on the surface, drinking tea, listening to music, in-depth simplicity, "give a steamed bun can feed."

Yuan: The origin of all things in heaven and earth, the male protagonist has realized the Tao, seen through the origin of the world, and mastered the law, which is the meaning of the extraordinary. Echoing the simplicity represented by the surname, there may also be a meaning of avenue to simplicity.

Ying: There is the meaning of being intelligent, and there should also be the meaning of hero, so is the male protagonist a hero? Poverty alleviation is nothing more than a game of killing the rich and helping the poor, and perhaps the writer defaults to a question mark when naming his name, indicating that this person is very controversial.

The dialogue between the characters in the book is permeated with metaphysical theological theological philosophy and psychology..... Is there really someone who has reached this level of dialogue in reality? That's real people, or really not people.

This is the most difficult book I have ever read, I can't read it all at once, so I'm going to try it a few more times.

Read on