After 10 days of chaos, world number one Djokovic was eventually deported by Australia a day before the Australian Open. These ten days were like a roller coaster thrill for Djokovic, but unfortunately he did not catch the last train of the Australian Open to defend his title. After Djokovic's deportation, there were mixed opinions, but whether Djokovic should be vaccinated or not, should he really be primarily responsible for his deportation?
The Australian Open was totally playing djokovic
In the first two months of the pandemic, Djokovic had shown distrust of vaccines, even though they had not yet been available. That is to say, Djokovic did not agree to vaccination all along. But what needs to be reiterated here is that Djokovic has never opposed others to vaccination, he just believes that individuals have the freedom and right to choose, which is the most misunderstood by the outside world, and also makes Djokovic face more ulterior motives. In October 2021, the Australian Tennis Association threw out the local regulation requiring two doses of vaccination to enter the country, and the voices about Djokovic's ability to participate in the Australian Open began to be loud. In fact, Djokovic has always insisted that he does not accept vaccines, that is, if the Australian Open and Australia insist on banning entry without vaccines, Djokovic will definitely withdraw from the Australian Open. However, the Australian Open threw an olive branch to Djokovic.
For the last three-time defending champions and the best player ever at the Australian Open to play in the Grand Slam he is best at, it would be a disaster in the words of the Australian Open director. So the Australian Open negotiated the conditions for the Australian government to introduce a medical exemption. Don't think about it, this condition of the Australian Open must have been ventilated with Djokovic very early, and told the world's first what materials should be prepared and how to deal with the government's cross-examination. At this moment, when Djokovic's entry into Australia was cancelled for the first time, it seemed quite strange. On the one hand, the Australian Open informs that the infection can be exempted, and on the other hand, the government says that the infection is not a condition for exemption, which cannot help but question the credibility of the Australian Open and the Australian government, and even directly force its credibility, which is also the truth of the "disaster of sports" reflected by many players. All the players are completely toyed with by the applause of politicians, who say yes or no!
Djokovic fell prey to the rules
Many see Djokovic as a rulebreaker, even elevating the source of criticism to the height of character. Djokovic did challenge the public's bottom line on a number of things, such as his organization of an Adelaide exhibition match during the pandemic that infected many people, such as his throwing of his racket at the Tokyo Olympics to the spectator stands... But as far as the matter is concerned, this farce of medical exemption, Djokovic is completely in accordance with the rules of the government, but he has become the ultimate victim of the struggle between all parties. Let's make a few assumptions and see what the final result looks like:
1. Without the exception of medical exemptions, Djokovic will not compete in Australia at all;
2. Inform the medical exemption that the conditions are not infected with the new crown and that Djokovic will not travel to Australia;
3. The Minister of Immigration cancels the visa twice after his appeal is successful, and Djokovic will not prepare for the war in Australia.
And now the situation is that the Australian Open falsely gave Djokovic hope, and then told him that this hope did not know where it came from, until the end, it is clear that the visa of the person must be cancelled, why do you let people come?