laitimes

Towns timeout 2+1? The Timberwolves hadn't timed out at the time of Potter's foul, and Towns' follow-up action was effective

Towns timeout 2+1? The Timberwolves hadn't timed out at the time of Potter's foul, and Towns' follow-up action was effective

Live bar Jan. 17 – The Warriors lost to the Timberwolves on the road today.

During the game, Towns caused a "timeout" foul that puzzled many fans and bartenders.

The situation was this: Porter fouled Downs as the Timberwolves' 24-second offensive time approached, and the referee blew a 2+1 penalty.

According to the rules, the timer should be suspended at the moment of foul (that is, the Timberwolves did not have a 24-second violation), so the follow-up Towns' coherent action is also effective, and the reason why the lights on the rebound are turned on at this time is because the technical staff failed to pause the timer immediately.

Towns timeout 2+1? The Timberwolves hadn't timed out at the time of Potter's foul, and Towns' follow-up action was effective
Towns timeout 2+1? The Timberwolves hadn't timed out at the time of Potter's foul, and Towns' follow-up action was effective

(Steve Galen)

Read on