"Violent Clouds and Sending Storks" is a 2009 plus short animation about "Flying House", and I prefer this short but heartwarming story to the story of the old child in "Flying House". The story of "Violent Clouds and Sending Storks" is not complicated, but the depth and emotional delicacy of it can warm every audience.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="2" > the source of the story of "Violent Clouds and Sending Storks</h1>"
The story of Violent Clouds and the Stork is based on Western legends that there is a bird named "Stork", which transports children. It is said that whoever gives the bird to the child falls on the roof of the house to make a nest, and the family will be happy and happy. Therefore, in the European countryside, it is often seen that there is a platform on the roof chimney of the house, which is specially prepared for the nesting of the bird.
The legendary child of the stork was given by god, but the child in this "Violent Cloud and the Stork of sending the child" was created by the cloud. In the film, the audience can see that the one-to-one combination of the violent cloud and the sending stork is actually a contractual relationship. The violent cloud makes the child, and the child stork is responsible for transporting it. It seems to be a virtuous circle of the system, but there is something wrong with this cloud.
Violent cloud gus always creates some violent baby. For example, baby crocodiles, baby goats, and baby porcupines. For the violent cloud, these violent babies have no harm, but for the child stork poke. These violent babies are often injured on the way to the transport, and every time they come back, they are scarred.
Although Yun and The Stork are a pair of intimate cooperative relations, only they are hurt every day, how to live this day. The stork peck, who had been holding up in front of the violent cloud, finally ran away in fright when the violent cloud gus made a shark baby again.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="7" > violent babies should not be denied</h1>
These violent babies who are disliked by the storks are actually not wrong in nature, because of nature, they will naturally hurt, and the innocent porcupine baby itself is also, the porcupine baby does not want to hurt others, but if there is no such life-saving thorn, others will come and hurt him.
The metaphor is for children who are flawed in their own personality but do not know it. Because of their flawed nature, they are often vigilant about their surroundings and convey this negative emotion to the people around them. But can the audience, including the author, say that these children are wrong? Not really.
Just like those children who are born with autism, they do not hesitate to completely seal themselves in order to protect themselves. In the face of these children, what we should do is not denial and resistance, we should accept them and guide them with a kind attitude as much as possible. That will help them.
At the same time, the film is also conveying to us a very simple message, the world is equal, the status of all things in this world is also equal, whether it is beautiful things or not, they are all part of this world, we should not stand in God's perspective to exclude these people.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="12" > sending storks and violent clouds</h1>
Admittedly, the protagonist in the film is such a happy pair of enemies. The final ending is also very suitable for Pixar's painting style, although the sending stork peck was scared away by the shark baby of the violent cloud gus, but in the end the sending stork peck still returned to the violent cloud gus, the same smile, the same scars, only one more body of protection.
The protagonists in the story do not abandon, although they are the sending son stork who has always been hurt and never calculated, or the violent cloud gus who dare not speak after being misunderstood, they finally reconcile. And maintain this contractual relationship, which can reflect some of the real things.
When facing a relationship, some people like to calculate gains and losses, and they will doubt their position and gains in the relationship. But often such a good calculation, but will lose this originally cherished feelings. It's like the misunderstanding at the beginning of the stork and violent cloud gus.
If it wasn't for the stork that sent the child, he later took the initiative to return to the side of the violent cloud. Maybe the relationship or even this contract is coming to an end. However, one day, zizuru can no longer transport violent cloud works. It's not that he doesn't want to, it's that he's already been hurt to death, and the turn of the injury is irreversible.
So he really went. But by that time
The Stork and violent cloud gus are retired together. There will be new storks and clouds of violence to take their place. At that point, the Stork will no longer have to be injured, and the violent cloud gus will no longer have to work at the cost of hurting their friends.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="19" > the final fragment</h1>
After the film was played, many friends came to me and accused the stork in the story of the Stork for showing stockholm syndrome, and the friendship between the Stork and the Violent Cloud made the Stork suffer a lot. However, in the end, the child stork can actually tolerate the violent cloud, and the electric eel baby at the end of the story also fiercely electrocuted a child stork, which really does not understand.
However, the author feels that the sending stork and the violent cloud are a pair of contractual relationships, and this combination is fixed. In the author's opinion, a simple analysis of the story theme of "Violent Clouds and Sending Storks" is to talk about how to get along and how to deal with when you are in a discordant relationship, or when you are in a relationship inferior position.
The protagonist of the film, the violent cloud, is obviously inseparable from the sending of the stork. Seeing that the stork did not return after fleeing, he was first angry at the betrayal of the other party, and then deeply lost. In the end, the stork returned to the cloud of violence with a smile and scars. It's about companionship between friends.
This story tells us that in a relationship, don't suffer from gains and losses, and don't care too much about your revenge. The emotional connection is mutual. Early withdrawal is an act of avoidance. Just like the violent cloud and the stork who reconciled at the end of the film, it is better to find out how not to hurt yourself and approach him.
This is a little heart-wrenching little story to watch, to see the hardships and forced smiles of the stork, but also to see the innocence of the cloud of heartache violence. However, what this film wants to express is persistence and responsibility. They kept their contract to each other with peace of mind. I didn't even know that this contract existed.