I don't know when the sexual antagonism has been so serious that it has completely affected the psychology of most people now, and the ideological values in their hearts have been distorted by various poisonous chicken soups on the Internet.
Recently, I received a message from a friend who was still studying saying that he liked a girl who was tall and tall, and her appearance was relatively outstanding, and her family was average. My friend, about 1 meter 73 looks medium bar family is doing business, but also some money. He liked this girl, and everyone knew it. He said that recently he received a message from a friend, saying that the girl was discussing behind his back that he was a second-degree cripple who was less than 1 meter 8, a toad who wanted to eat swan meat or something, a mouthful of a Puxin man really under the head and so on. I comforted him for a long time after he told me that he had become the laughing stock of his class.
I also thought about this matter for a long time, or decided to send it out, in the case of a person without moral defects, the use of derogatory terms to describe others or even insult others is their own moral problems are not right. How to say that even if you don't like him as a person, but he has no moral defects, a second-degree cripple, judging the physical appearance of others, don't you yourself feel excessive? Radish greens have their own love, like 1 meter 8 or more, there is nothing wrong with it, but there is no need to maliciously belittle the judgment.
Back to the topic of gender antagonism, the topic of bisexual antagonism has become more and more intense, from the previous straight men and straight women, to the current Puxin men under the head of men, the next head of women, female boxers, in fact, from the essence I can not understand, from the poisonous chicken soup to Yang Kasa openly provoked male and female antagonism.
In recent years, the murder of flight attendants in Didi is boiling over, and it has also attracted the attention and common indignation of many netizens. This case was originally a heinous and regrettable incident, but some people with ulterior motives issued some extreme remarks to provoke gender antagonism, putting the responsibility on all men, to accuse all men of imposing their imagination on all boys. In their eyes, all the boys in the world are dark creatures, and everything about boys is sin. At this time, another group of people will jump out and say something, if it is not the victim who is too exposed to dress, how can he be poisoned by this, according to the idea of a normal person, at this time I believe that no one can say such a thing. Behind it is obviously an attempt to deliberately provoke contradictions between the sexes.
I can't understand that in fact, this kind of problem cannot form or should form a gender antagonism, because in essence, this matter itself is a legal issue, and the murderer should be punished by the law as he deserves.
We should condemn criminals from the perspective of the law. At the same time, we should also warn us to protect ourselves and remind ourselves to pay attention to our own safety.
For example:
Our dormitory did not lock the door for a long time, and the finances of the dormitory were lost. Shouldn't we go after the thieves and warn us that our own property should be protected? The matter itself is a single legal question, so why should it give rise to the antagonism between the sexes?
There is also the recent Guangdong Medical University glass bottle incident has also caused a fierce discussion among male and female netizens, and there are many men who do not understand the origin of this matter, and now I will take you to sort it out. The cause of the matter is actually very simple, that is, when queuing for food, it caused a dispute between two classmates, the girl first kicked the boy and then the boy loudly stopped the girl from listening, and when the girl kicked the 4th foot, the boy subdued it. The girl scolded and grinned and left, but actually went back to the dormitory to get a glass bottle, taking advantage of the fact that the boy was in line to look down at the mobile phone when he directly took the bottle to smash the back of his head, the boy turned his head to see the girl and then the two were pulled apart, after pulling apart, the girl suddenly burst out, picked up the glass bottle fragments and frantically stabbed at the boy who had been injured. Finally, the girls even yelled insults at the boys when they left.
The school's response pushed the matter to a climax. The girls born in the school have been taken home by their parents and subsequently dealt with according to the results of the police investigation.
This matter has triggered a fierce debate among netizens from all sides. In it, I saw a remark that said" "Boys let girls not have so many things before" The comments at the bottom netizens are also arguing endlessly. Seeing this, I would like to say that it is true that equality between men and women is now advocated, but it does not mean that either party needs bottomless humility. Humility is upbringing, and it is understandable not to be humble.
Support for women's rights is to break the phenomenon of male superiority and inferiority in the old society, and to pursue equality between men and women, where both men and women can read and have equal rights. The most intuitive manifestation of support for women's rights is the legally designated monogamy of the state. True women's rights and men's rights refer to equality between men and women, and equal rights for men and women. Instead of the pastoral feminism on the Internet that is now distorted by some people with ulterior motives, it is not to let men or women have absolute dominance
So who is the ultimate beneficiary of provoking gender antagonism? Capitalism is the ultimate beneficiary of provoking gender antagonism.
Yang Kasa openly provoked gender antagonism in the show, is this her own idea? Thinking on a deeper level about openly provoking the antagonism between the sexes, what is obtained is the ratings, and the pure commercial use is the pocket of the capitalists behind it.
"Provoke sexual antagonism
You and I are swords
It's also fish."
--- cow and horse poet