There are former NBA players who criticize Irving, nothing more than want to take advantage of Irving's dividends, but this matter small leather ball still has to be stated, calling on more people to pay attention to basketball itself, not to be easily fooled.
Former NBA player Eddie A-Johnson pushed even more: "The Nets will go through a difficult process and then understand that playing AAU-style basketball cannot rush out of the East. Second, healthy part-time players undermine the continuity of the team. Yes, that's it. ”
On the face of it, the former NBA player is right that Irving's intermittent participation in team games can affect chemistry, while the Nets' way of playing is too simple, it is pure singles, and it is impossible to win the championship. This is something that everyone can clearly see.
But if you look closely at the Nets, you will find that the current Problems of the Nets are almost impossible to be their main problems in the future. The current problems will gradually be digested by the Update of the Nets' status in the future.
First of all, can Owen's part-time job really affect the chemistry?
The reality is that Owen appears to be influencing the chemistry, but is actually in a rescue.
Before Irving's comeback, the Nets had already seen a situation of over-reliance on Durant, and in addition to this situation, the Nets also faced a situation where Harden could not lift up. Harden's inability to lift status is a more serious problem because the Nets desperately need Harden's scoring.
At the beginning of the season, Harden struggled with the new rules and later regained his ideal number of free throws, but in the process Harden looked too much for free throws, which was really not like the core members of a championship-seeking team. It was as if Harden had been making fouls and forcing the referee to give him a whistle.
The NBA league changed the blow penalty for making fouls, essentially to improve the viewing and competitiveness, and Harden has been creating fouls, which is a bit contrary to the tone that the league wants to change.
Having to prove yourself right in fouls just highlights Harden's pattern.
Due to Harden's previous loss and lack of hurrying at the rocket's critical moment, in fact, the Nets should also worry about whether Harden can support the Nets' organizational system. If a person who is not wholehearted is placed in an important position, the future of the team can be imagined, and the news we see is that Harden did not renew his contract early.
Outside of that, Harden has only played a few high-scoring performances this season, and other times more like Durant's accessories, he hasn't shown what he should be. Compared to Durant's stability, Harden's ups and downs have changed a lot, and even he himself did not know the reasons and ways to change them.
It is in this context that the Nets and Irving reached a compromise, so Irving's comeback is to help the Nets.
It should not be limited to a few games, the sample is small and the error is large. For a long time and in the long run, Irving is definitely a presence that has helped Harden and Durant reduce their burdens, and there is no doubt about it. If you just look at these two games, many people will think that Irving will only play alone, and the help to the team is not so great.
But don't forget, the Nets' tactics are essentially to promote more singles, and Nash does not have a particularly good tactic.
Nash is not Cole, there is no rotation system, the Nets' ball does not flow around, the players can not run around and block, they just run the position simply, and then help Durant singles. That's their main tone this season.
After Irving's comeback, the equivalent of "two Durant" holding the ball in the flanks singles, role players only need to run a little bit and block, very simple. And the "two Durant" lineup, obviously diluted Durant's one-man offensive pressure.
Before Irving's comeback, Durant alone gave nash a tactical sporadic shame, and after Irving's comeback, Durant and Irving together covered Nash's shame. It's both a shame and an execution tactic, and the Nets' tactics have no complicated component, only occasional passes that facilitate singles and singles players.
So what about part-time Irving hurting the team system or chemistry?
Irving only said to save the team, not to hurt the team chemistry, because the Nets have no so-called chemistry. If the Nets had chemistry, they would be just like the Warriors, and no matter who was involved, the team would still be well-organized, and Brooklyn obviously couldn't do that.
With the Nets' staff in order, the current problems can be solved. Imagine that when Harris and Mills are on the floor at the same time, the Big Three's singles or organization will seem powerful.
This statement against Owen, then, is formed because the European man is a controversial person.
As long as you criticize Owen, there will be many concurrs, and because of owen's complexity, the composition of consonants is seven or eight, so they form a camp.
In fact, this is not necessary.
Irving's Nets are so skilled that we, as fans, can watch him stop there. As for the social issues he is concerned about, we can't get a glimpse of the whole picture, and we can observe and summarize it from a perspective?
Whenever faced with a controversial event, it is the will quality that adults should have when not in a hurry to stand in the crowd, not to use the language of the crowd, to find the profoundness of theory and practice, and then choose to join or be independent.