In the final moments of the guangsha team and the Shenzhen team, due to Sun Minghui's breakthrough pass error, Hu Jinqiu flew to the sideline to save the ball, but the result was to save the ball in the hands of the opponent, and the result was that the Shenzhen team immediately launched a quick attack counterattack, taking advantage of the opportunity to play more and play less.
After the game, there was such a voice on the Internet, thinking that Hu Jinqiu should not save the ball, because if he did not save the ball, even if the ball belonged to the Shenzhen team, then the Shenzhen team was also a backcourt serve, and the Guangsha team could fully defend the position, obviously the situation was much better than being attacked by the opponent and played less, and maybe the winner would be the Guangsha team.
This statement may seem reasonable at first glance, but in fact it does not stand up to scrutiny. Because this statement is completely inverted as a cause, it also brings in the "god perspective".
I would like to ask, if Hu Jinqiu's ball is successfully saved and passed into the hands of the Guangsha players, will these people still feel that Hu Jinqiu's act of saving the ball is wrong? I am afraid that the conclusion will be reversed and Hu Jinqiu will be blown up. That is to say, whether Hu Jinqiu should save this ball or not depends on his act of saving the ball at all, but purely the result of saving the ball.
But the problem is that no player can guarantee that he will save the ball in the hands of his own players when saving the ball, if the conclusion that Hu Jinqiu should not save the ball is true. Then in the game, no player should save the ball, after all, as long as you save the ball, you may save the opponent's hands.
Of course, some people may refute that the judgment of whether to save or not to save should be made according to the situation on the field, in other words, the unsure ball should not be saved. This statement is actually wrong, because Hu Jinqiu did not have time to think and judge at that time.
Sun Minghui's passing mistake was completely an accident, and Hu Jinqiu could not predict the prophet, so naturally there was no time to prepare in advance. In this case, he can only have the spirit of fighting for every ball, subconsciously to save the ball, and it is impossible to press the pause button when saving the ball, carefully consider the pros and cons of saving the ball, and then make a reaction that should not be saved.
Really when he fully understood, the ball was out of bounds early, and at that time, the Guangsha team was only 1 point ahead, and they could not guarantee that after they fell into the position, they would be able to prevent the attack of the Shenzhen team. If the ball is given to the opponent, it is equivalent to letting the opponent take the initiative, which is obviously not good for the Guangsha team.
And if you don't have to fight the ball that you are not sure of, that is to say, the ball that appears on the field is five or five and should be abandoned. But in reality, will there be coaches who ask their players to give up the right to fight for the ball? If there is such a requirement, how can a team with no fighting spirit win when it encounters an evenly matched opponent?
Therefore, Hu Jinqiu's act of saving the ball, there is no problem at all, even if the Guangsha team replays the video after the game, it should reflect on why Sun Minghui's last attack is 1 point ahead of the opponent and does not press the time to foul the opponent, but also to take the initiative to attack and pass the mistake. The next time if he encounters a similar situation, I believe that Hu Jinqiu will still choose to save the ball, because the spirit of every ball must be fought for is not wrong, not to mention, maybe next time, he will save the ball to the hands of his teammates and become a hero to save the team.