British male gods, ten handsome and nine bald.
If there is anything that British male actors have in common besides "selling corruption", it should be the hairline that moves backward year by year.
Qiu Hua, Jitter Sen, Pattinson, bald is completely statham.
Recently, another male god fell into the spell of "bald killing"——
Brexit: The Unreasonable Battle
I believe that many fans are roaring in their hearts when they see the above poster:
What about my curly hairline!!!!
"Curly Fu", whose full name is Benedict Cumberbatch, presumably does not need to be introduced to Him.
"Sherlock", "Doctor Strange", "Imitation Game", each of which is well known.
Everyone may wonder, obviously last year in "Melrose" the hairline is still quite gratifying, how in just half a year, the hair said no is gone?
Curly Fu's face was long, and this hairline stretched again, and when he looked at it, half of his face was his forehead.
Sorry, a little can't help but laugh.
Don't worry, Curly Fu is not bald at the moment, this is just a styling setting.
In the new work "Brexit", Roll Fu plays Dominic Cummings, the chief director of the "Brexiteer" campaign "Vote Leave" in the Brexit referendum.
Look at people who are worried about the country and the people, they have lost their hair before leaving the EU.
Well, no kidding.
This new HBO drama, with only 1 episode and 2 hours, debunked the ins and outs of the Brexit event that shocked the world 3 years ago.
In the 1940s, when world war broke out, Britain realized the need to establish a united Europe. So in 1973, it officially joined the European Community.
But in 2015, the Uk decided to renegotiate its membership in the European Union and launched the referendum process.
The Brexit referendum became one of the hottest topics in the world in 2016.
Do you want to go or stay? The UK is divided into two major factions: the "Brexiteers" and the "Remainers".
As the leader of the Brexiteers, his purpose is simple, that is, to find ways to win more voters to support him.
In his view, there are actually three types of voters:
"Brexiteers", "Remainers", and the melon-eating masses who are confused about the situation.
The key to winning the campaign is not to pull people from the opposing camp, but to get the support of "neutral voters".
He knows that for most ordinary people, discussing Brexit or Remain with them will have little effect on the people's livelihood economy, the international situation and other grand propositions.
Be sure to poke their G-spot.
So, Hefu came up with a slogan called "Take Back Control".
This "back", like a stroke of God, successfully caused a "psychological gap" for people -
It was supposed to be my thing, and of course there was a reason to take it back.
This sentence is not empty, the EU has indeed brought a certain degree of blow to the British people's livelihood.
Among them, the refugee problem is one of the main causes.
At first, left-wing parties in Germany, France and other countries claimed that the introduction of refugees could provide cheap labor for the EU.
However, the large number of foreign cheap labor has led to a significant reduction in the wages of domestic workers and a sharp increase in competitive pressure.
In the film, Heon Fu and his team visit a worker's family— a man who worked as a steel worker for 24 years and is now unemployed at home.
"They have work, and people like us are squeezed out."
Without employment opportunities, neighbors and even children have moved away, leaving the couple to fight with life in the same place.
In this case, it is just a slogan for Benny.
This gives them the illusion that if they want to regain control of their lives, they will have to vote for Brexit.
But whether they can get a job back from Brexit, they don't really know.
Offline visits are important, but if you want to reach a wider range of voters, you still have to rely on the Internet.
Roll Fu abandoned the traditional and old-school "carpet advertising" and went directly to the company to develop a software -
Individual Facebook and Twitter accounts are combined with voter handbooks, poll predictions, and canvassing to "tailor the message" for them through algorithms.
Isn't this Xiangyu's usual experience of visiting Taobao!
I searched for a white shirt, and the homepage could recommend different versions of white shirts to me every day...
Big data can not only guide economic consumption, but also influence national political events!
The film devotes a great deal of space to criticizing the Brexiteers' perverse propaganda tactics.
The most serious of these is the "false incitement" of the Fu side -
Emphasis on "£350 million" and "Turkey" for wavering voters.
Brexiteers declared:
"The UK gives the EU £350 million a week, and we should spend that money on the NHS."
Ordinary people who could not understand the inside feelings listened, of course, they were immediately excited, and felt that the taxes they had worked so hard to pay had been squandered by the state.
However, "Conservative MPs" debunked rumors that this was outright "fake news" and that it was a "panic bomb" released by Brexiteers in order to win.
This money does not exist at all.
So even if it leaves the EU, it will not be out of thin air; the reality is that the United Kingdom will face a tragic situation of currency depreciation and economic contraction.
Anyone can say something beautiful, but actual action is another matter.
The MP said bluntly:
"The people who made these promises weren't elected [in any important position], and they weren't going to form a government.
Whether they write billions of empty checks, after Brexit, they have no power or responsibility to deliver on any of their promises."
After half a day, they only wanted to achieve the goal of "winning".
More excesses are yet to come.
Don't forget, there is also a "Turkey" in the "Incitement Package".
The pamphlet on the roll-up side reads: "70 million Turks have come to England", a frightening figure that makes everyone unacceptable.
But the problem is that "70 million" is "Turkey's actual population", not the number of immigrants that the UK will accept.
Ironically, the lie is so great that nearly 20 million British voters believe it.
The "victory weapon" of the Brexiteers is actually the ignorance of the people.
Despite britain's many years of membership, for most people, they have never thought about what the EU really is and what it brings them.
All they can see is the grievances of life in front of them, and the "Brexiteers" 'take back control of you' has successfully diverted their attention to the EU.
I am unemployed, all blame the EU; I have low wages, I blame the EU; I can't find a partner, I blame the EU; my house leaks, all blame the EU.
The EU has become the "back cooker" of all problems.
Blindly following the guidance of public opinion has become an unavoidable thing. Which faction can solve my troubles, I will support which side.
But as the MP said above, Brexiteer advocacy groups have only given the people an outlet for their emotions, but they have not, and they cannot provide practical solutions.
The Brexit referendum has become an irrational populist carnival.
Even a few days before the referendum, a sitting member of Congress was assassinated, leaving the whole thing suddenly stained with blood.
As a result, as you know, the UK eventually left the EU.
The film concludes with two important pieces of information:
1. The Brexiteer-led canvassing campaign violates the Electoral Law;
2. The two data companies behind Brexiteer are linked to billionaire Robert Mercer, who is also the biggest donor to the Trump campaign.
The water is too deep!
There is no doubt that the starting point of the Referendum in Britain is to "give the people of this country the right to determine their own destiny".
But as the movie shows, there are too many uncertainties, everyone receives information from different angles, and true and false information is even more confusing.
But often, people prefer more inflammatory fake news to ignore "boring, tedious" real news.
Although I don't know what kind of shady scenes Trump has, since he is mentioned, it is inevitable that Xiangyu thinks of Hillary Clinton, who was defeated that year, and was also "pitted" by fake news.
Fast forward to the end of 2016, when there was a shooting (without casualties) at a pizzeria in Washington, D.C., the gun owner was motivated by a hot topic on social media called Pizzagate.
The conversation went straight to Hillary Clinton, saying the pizzeria was a "child abuse base camp" led by Hillary.
When the election is in the head, a little bit of wind and grass can stir up public opinion. But like Xiangyu said, this is also fake news.
The Pew Research Center survey in the United States found that 62% of Americans get most or all of the information from social media, but this information is uploaded instantly and has not been verified by any facts.
There are even teams that specialize in writing fake news, earning tens of thousands of dollars in "ill-gotten gains" through the spread of this "fake content."
In this internet age, which is flooded with data and information, we think that rich social channels make the world more transparent.
As everyone knows, the useless information mixed with true and false makes us more and more distant from the truth.
"Popular anger" replaced "reason", "personal emotion" replaced "deep thinking", and the rabble obediently closed their ears, blindfolded their eyes, and immersed themselves in the pleasure of venting.
In the issue of Talking about Li Tian, Xu Zhiyuan once called the current information society a "storm society":
When a point of excitement arises, we rush through like a storm. After the storm, there was no grass, and then we were looking for the next storm mouth.
It is in the carnival of chasing the mouth of the information storm again and again that we become shallow, become simple and boring, and eventually become prisoners of information smoke.
If the bald head is not tight, it is afraid that it is bald brain.
People who like this article also like · · · · · ·