laitimes

Treasure experts spent 170,000 yuan to "cleverly take" the true relics of Qianlong, and sold 80 million yuan, but the results were reversed

With the development of the economy, the living standard is also gradually improving, some people are also keen to collect cultural relics, in recent years, cultural relics identification has become a big point of view, in addition to watching cultural relics, a staggering sky-high price is also frightening, but people have to see the "eyes" when.

Treasure experts spent 170,000 yuan to "cleverly take" the true relics of Qianlong, and sold 80 million yuan, but the results were reversed

In order not to let some cultural relics lose their value, the original owner will often sell at a low price, 10 years ago, a pair of Qianlong authentic works in the treasure program was identified as a fake, in the experts under the matching of 170,000 sold, the result of a year later this Qianlong authentic painting auctioned for 87.36 million yuan.

This qianlong authentic painting is "Songyang Hanbaitu", Qianlong fifteen years (1750), Qianlong is 40 years old, he followed Yao Yushun's patrol of the "Five Mountains" of the classic, he led the Prince Belle Wenwu Minister, specially rushed to Songshan, he came to songyang academy, one of the four major academies, looking at the mountain peak, watching Hanbai.

Treasure experts spent 170,000 yuan to "cleverly take" the true relics of Qianlong, and sold 80 million yuan, but the results were reversed

Among them, the two Hanbai of Songyang Academy are mighty and tall, it is said that these two Hanbai are also sealed by emperor Wu of Han, he sealed three Hanbai, for the "Great General", "Second General" and "Three Generals", but the old third was not able to survive, and the Hanbai painted by Qianlong is the "Second General", it has 4500 years of tree age, 18.2 meters high, 12.5 meters thick, which is also the largest and oldest Han Cypress in China.

Qianlong painted "Songyang HanBaitu" more than once, there are four recorded paintings, these four pairs were successively given to the royal family, but due to the war in the late Qing Dynasty, all four paintings were lost, but there are two paintings preserved in the museum, and the third painting fell into the hands of Zhu Yun brothers, the citizens of Zhengzhou, and became the heirloom of the Zhu family.

Treasure experts spent 170,000 yuan to "cleverly take" the true relics of Qianlong, and sold 80 million yuan, but the results were reversed

In 2009, Zhu Yun did not know whether the qianlong true manuscript handed down by the ancestors was true or false, so he took it to the treasure hunting program, and an expert named Liu Yan identified "Songyang Hanbotu", saying that this is an old object, but it is not a real thing, and it is worth up to 30,000 yuan.

The Zhu Yun brothers returned disappointed, and more than half a month later, Liu Yan experts called him and said that someone was very interested in the Humberto in his hand and planned to buy it, and after his "kind" matchmaking, Zhu Yun and a collector named Cheng Gong traded for 170,000 yuan.

Treasure experts spent 170,000 yuan to "cleverly take" the true relics of Qianlong, and sold 80 million yuan, but the results were reversed

Originally, things should have come to an end, but just a year later, Zhu Yun saw a news that "Songyang HanBotu" was auctioned at an auction venue for 8736 yuan, Zhu Yun realized that he had been deceived, and he took the reporter to find Liu Yan.

Liu Yan's reply is: "This kind of thing in the art market is too much, the so-called works of art are by speculation, today's price of 170,000, tomorrow may be tens of millions", for Liu Yan's reply, Zhu Yun brothers are very angry, after many times to ask for fruitless, directly on the grounds of fraudulent purchase of Liu Yan to court.

Treasure experts spent 170,000 yuan to "cleverly take" the true relics of Qianlong, and sold 80 million yuan, but the results were reversed

Since the case involved criminal fraud, the court did not file a case, and the evidence must be collected by the relevant departments first, and the court can only make a judgment if the evidence is conclusive. Now this case, involving too many problems, is completely in a dilemma, and has not been settled to this day.

Read on