Growth Record - What is Multidimensional Competitiveness (7)

I don't know if you have such an illusion, my previous happiness was based on the fact that my salary was twenty percent more than the old king next door. And enjoy yourself.

Now I finally know that this is an illusion produced by comparison.

The so-called growth, from another point of view, is the process of constantly comparing others.

But comparison is relative, and relativeness never ends. More than the old king next door, and the old Li upstairs, the old grandson downstairs.

Until I saw an article by Mr. Xiao Lai, which gave me great inspiration, he explained multidimensional competitiveness in this way.

First, what is multidimensional competitiveness

Multi-dimensional competitiveness is to be competitive in multiple dimensions under the premise that a certain competitiveness is particularly excellent.

To borrow geometric terms, it's easy to understand:

In a single dimension, everyone is compared to the length;

On two dimensions, everyone compares the area;

At three latitudes, we compare volume.

Indeed, in terms of a single dimension, there is only one first. I reviewed the concept of backwardness yesterday. Then from a single dimension, the latter 99% may be lagging behind.

This is going to kill you. But that's not even the worst part. The most damning thing is that even the first of a single dimension can be the same.

I almost spewed out a mouthful of old blood.

Let's take a look at so many champions in the athletics category, how many do we remember? Since the 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games, these champions, Li Ning, Lang Ping, Li Yuwei, Wu Xiaoxuan, Zeng Guoqiang, Wu Shude, Chen Weiqiang, Yao Jingyuan, Zhou Jihong, Luan Jujie, Xu Haifeng...

In addition to Xu Haifeng, China's first Olympic gold medal, the other estimates are only Li Ning and Lang Ping.

Because both of them have opened up one or even more dimensions in addition to the dimensions they have ever done best.

Li Ning's sports brand, Lang Ping's coach. Others may not have pioneered, or failed to develop, or simply not developed.

Second, why is multidimensional competitiveness so strong?

I know that in a single dimension than length, up to 100 points, who is long wins.

The area ratio in both dimensions, even if each is only 50 points, the area is already 2,500;

The three dimensions are specific to the volume, and if each had 50 points, it would already be 125,000.

People who know how powerful now are often not a little bit stronger, but a gap of several orders of magnitude.

Using high dimensions to play low dimensions is almost like what is played, and there is no comparison at all. Suddenly found myself small to dust.

A few years ago, when I went back to the 15th anniversary party of high school graduation, the teacher sighed: those who had average grades in those years had become bosses.

I didn't think anything of it at the time, but I've heard a lot of people say that. Until I understood multidimensional competitiveness, now I think about it. I felt that I didn't know it at the time.

The reason why the teachers sighed was also because they did not expect that in addition to the school's test scores, there were many other dimensions of life.

If Jobs had been hard bar technical parameters with geeks, it is estimated that he would have been crushed long ago. But he took a different path. He combined computers with art. It worked.

The power of this cross-border combination, if successful, is by no means as simple as making a little progress every day. The energy is absolutely geometric. We have also seen Apple's achievements.

This is the power of multidimensional competitiveness. Of course, not everyone can have this ability casually.

If the technical parameters of the Apple computer are not too hard, it is estimated that it is useless to tie it to money.

So, how is this multidimensional competitiveness built, and what conditions does it need to have?

Third, how to build multi-dimensional competitiveness

I was investing when I was making money or not. It was a near-fatal operation.

Not only did he lose all his money, but he also owed a lot of debt.

The so-called negative score is that the skills to make money cannot support the cost of living expenses. At this time, the main energy is to improve the skills of making money, rather than blindly tossing and turning investments. Of course, learning is possible and must be learned.

It is only normal for us to invest with excess money if the cost of living is satisfied.

Therefore, to create multi-dimensional competitiveness, a prerequisite must be that my individual ability must be above the passing score, and other dimensions are likely to play a role.

This means that if you have three skills, as long as one of them is negative, then the result of multiplying must be negative. The bigger the negative score, the worse the result.

In the case of a single skill, the expansion of any one dimension can bring unexpected surprises to yourself.

So we must keep these three realizations in mind and digest them in the bloodstream:

First, life has multiple dimensions;

Second, it is possible to win by building competitiveness in multiple dimensions;

Third, it is possible to maximize efficiency by being prominent enough in at least one dimension.

At last

Life is an infinitus journey, I only carry a stick on the road, and I may hang up when I meet a tiger.

I went on the road with a knife and a stick at the same time, so I could still give a fight when I met a tiger.

If I put on my armor and carry a submachine gun on the road, I will be invincible even if I encounter thousands of troops and horses.

We are not alone on the road to growth, and the road is not crowded. Hopefully, you can also take the invincible armor and equipment on the road to fight monster upgrades.