The "traceability report" of the United States is a "throwing pot report"

Source: People's Daily Overseas Edition

Just over two months after the suspension, the US intelligence community has begun to hype up the traceability of the new crown virus. Recently, the Office of the Us Director of Intelligence released a "decrypted version" of the so-called "decrypted version" report on the traceability of the new crown virus, taking out the "laboratory leakage theory" to "fry cold rice". At the end of August, U.S. intelligence released a summary of the report to discredit China without any evidence.

It was a joke that intelligence agencies were involved in the scientific problem of tracing the virus. However, the U.S. government ordered intelligence agencies to conduct a 90-day "investigation" with painstaking efforts, first compiling a summary and then concocting a full text, insisting on singing the old drama of politicizing the epidemic to the end.

Let's first look at the so-called "traceability report" argument. The report begins by blaming China, saying that "the first known cases were found in China" and that "China did not have sufficient expectations for the spread of the virus," making it clear that this is not a real scientific report that strips away the cocoon, but a pre-set, guilty inference script.

Let's look at the assessment method of the so-called "traceability report". The report said four U.S. intelligence agencies and the U.S. National Intelligence Council assessed with "low confidence" that "the initial coronavirus infection may be due to natural contact with animals infected with the virus or related progenitor viruses." Another intelligence agency assessed with "medium confidence" that "the origin of the new crown virus is most likely related to a laboratory accident, which may involve experiments, animal handling or sampling at the Wuhan Institute of Virology." In fact, only one sentence is said throughout, and there is no reliable evidence to prove the "laboratory leak theory".

Look at the attribution of the so-called "traceability report". The report blames the U.S. intelligence community's disagreement over traceability on China's "obstruction of international investigations and refusal to share information" and "china's cooperation to make a final assessment of the origins of the coronavirus." What a mess, upside down black and white! China's open and transparent attitude on the issue of virus traceability is obvious to all in the international community. At the beginning of the epidemic, China shared the genetic sequence of the virus for the first time, and twice invited WHO experts to China to carry out traceability research and provide all conveniences for it. In contrast, in the United States, the timeline of the domestic epidemic is constantly advancing, and the biological laboratories of Fort Detrick and the University of North Carolina are full of bad deeds, but they have not responded positively to international doubts. This big hat of "obstructing international investigations" is the most suitable for the United States to wear.

At a time when the United States is busy fabricating accusations against China, the epidemic situation in its home country is worsening. According to the Statistics of the New York Times, as of November 10, there were 98,390 new confirmed cases in the United States in a single day, with a cumulative total of more than 46.8 million confirmed cases and more than 759,000 deaths. At such an urgent juncture, the politicians of the two us parties even debated endlessly on the basis of whether to vaccinate or not. A few days ago, Biden's executive order requiring more than 100 employees to be vaccinated against the new crown was ruled "unconstitutional" by the New Orleans Court of Appeals, and Texas, Louisiana and other Republican-helm states also strongly opposed the vaccine injunction, resulting in another step away from widespread vaccination in the United States.

The United States has tried every means to "take the rhythm" on the issue of tracing the origin of the new crown virus and kidnapped the WHO to carry out the so-called "secondary traceability" against China, and the international community can clearly see this intention. Last month, WHO published a list of proposed new expert groups for virus traceability, and six experts who had gone to Wuhan, Hubei Province, in the first phase to participate in traceability studies were selected again. They have all made it clear that the Wuhan laboratory leak hypothesis is "highly unlikely."

Instead of making up stories in vain and deliberately spilling dirty water, the United States should listen to the just voice of the international community against the politicization of the issue of traceability, and return to the right path of scientific traceability and cooperation in fighting the epidemic at an early date.