There is a stand-up "Stealing axe" in traditional cross-talk, Zhang Shouchen and Liu Baorui have said, there are also counterpart versions, the story is very funny, as long as the normal performance will not be bad.
Synopsis of "Stealing the Axe": The father took his son and apprentice to the master's house pretending to be a false monk to do things, and they not only cheated on eating, drinking, and cheating money, but also stole things from the master's house. On this day, the father sat on the altar and saw that there was an axe behind the door of the master's house, so he used the way of chanting to pass on the message to his son who was sitting under the stage and asked him to steal the axe. The son thought that the axe was too big to hide, and secretly replied to his father by chanting...
"Stealing the Axe" belongs to the traditional cross-talk "satire to expose the ugly phenomena in life" paragraph, although the story is relatively old, but the content is very suitable for cross-talk, so it has been circulated for many years and has been performed by many cross-talk artists in various versions, including Guo Degang Yuqian, there is a 29-minute version of "Stealing the Axe" on the Internet.
It is a bit of a coincidence that the combination of Tianjin TV host Qiu Yingjun and Nankai University teacher Yu Dan also said an 18-minute version of "Stealing axes" at the first intangible cultural heritage cross-talk conference.
The two versions of "Stealing axes" are basically the same, but there are great differences in content and style, and for the current cross-talk market and cross-talk audiences, the two cross-talk are very contrasting.
One or two versions of the content
Guo Degang Yuqian's 29-minute version of "Stealing the Axe" has a very long pad talk, almost reaching 25 minutes, that is to say, the positive and living part is only more than 3 minutes, don't look at the serious imbalance between the pad talk and the positive and live ratio, but it is currently Guo Degang Yuqian's fixed playing style when performing traditional cross-talk, that is, infinitely elongated pad words, infinite compression of positive life.
The pad part is still the same old three that Guo Degang often appears in Yu Qian's cross-talk: Yu Qian's family, network paragraphs, and and farts.
Yu Qian's family is more complete in this cross-talk, Guo Degang is the emperor, Yu Qian is the prince, Yu Qian's father is the fourth brother, and Yu Qian's son is the fifth brother.
Yu Qian's mother let Yu Qian breastfeed until he was a teenager, the school let the students bring food at noon, others brought lunch boxes, Yu Qian took his mother, yu Qian's mother directly unbuttoned in the classroom to feed Yu Qian when it was time to eat at noon, and Yu Qian beckoned the class leader to eat with the teacher.
In this part of the pad words, there is also Yu Qian's grandfather, whose name is also very distinctive, Yu Fart. He went to play billiards, and several of them were crooked, but the last lightning bolt hit Yu Qian's grandmother Zhuge Steel next to him, and God said: I also played crooked. Of course, this is obviously a network segment change.
The transition from pad talk to positive life is relatively blunt, and in the pad words, Yu Qian's grandfather Yu Xiao Fart and Yu Qian's father Yu Xiao Fart are still warlords and warlord sons, and in the blink of an eye, they become false monks to chant the scriptures, and when chanting the scriptures, Yu Qian and Yu Xiao Fart are vigorously exhausting, and the onlookers are smoked away.
The last three minutes or so into the right life, basically similar to the traditional cross-talk, the difference in the beginning of the chanting is the tune used in the ass is the "Ussuri Boat Song".
Relatively speaking, Qiu Yingjun and Yu Dan's 18-minute version of "Stealing axes" is a feature of Wen Hao.
The pad part has 8 minutes, first of all, two small stories are used to tell the characteristics of Tianjin people talking, one is that the host Wang Weinian stepped on the feet of a Tianjin person, but the other party said"Master, do you still step on this foot?" If you don't step on me, I can take it."
The other is that Tianjin people take three driver's licenses to deal with violations, and it turns out that they have to deduct 638 points, and the Tianjin people behind them joke: "Your score is enough to test Tsinghua."
Then Qiu Yingjun looked for Yu Dan's doctoral degree and philosophy teacher status, from a philosophical point of view, the negative result of negation is positive, but from the way Beijingers speak for example, the negation of negation may still be negative, so philosophy textbooks should add a parenthesis here "The negation of negation is affirmation (except for Beijingers)", which is of course a small burden.
From philosophy to the contrast between superstition and religion, pad words smoothly turned into the positive life "Stealing axes".
Qiu Yingjun Yu Dan made some modern adaptations of Zhenghuo, the protagonist fake monk father and son became Jia Xuming's father and Jia Xuming (Jia Xuming was the first to play in this performance, and several actors in the back smashed him), if this cross-talk is placed in the Tianjin Tea House, the protagonist will of course be replaced by another person who is more familiar to the audience, such as Zhao Jinsheng.
Another adaptation is that Jia Xuming's father sang "Learn to Cat Call" when he was chanting the scriptures, and after two years, this saliva song was not popular and would definitely be replaced by the next popular song at that time.
A total of 10 minutes of zhenghuo Qiu Yingjun and Yu Dan performed very well, not hurrying and tightening the seams.
Comparison of the two versions
In contrast, Qiu Yingjun and Yu Dan's version of "Stealing axes" is obviously more complete and more standard than Guo Degang Yuqian's version of "Stealing Axes", with a good foundation in place, there is logic between the pad words and the pad words and between the pad words and the positive life, and the content of the intermediate adaptation is also very spatio-temporal and personal, such as the small baggage about philosophy, which is obviously very in line with the identity of both of them as high-achieving students at famous universities, not to mention that Yu Dan himself is a teacher of philosophy at Nankai University.
In contrast, Guo Degang Yu Qian's version of Stealing axes is relatively fragmentary, the cushion is not in place, the logic between the pad words and the pad words and between the pad words and the right life is the Yu Qian family, and the content adapted in the middle is also their characteristics, Yu Qian's family, and urine farts and network paragraphs.
From the stylistic point of view, the difference between the two versions is even greater, obviously Qiu Yingjun Yu Dan's version is Wen Qi, and Guo Degang's Version of Yu Qian is somewhat less interesting, especially the section where Yu Qian asks the class teacher and the class leader to "eat" together in the pad words, and the passage where Yu Qian's grandfather and father are violently exhausting in the house, which is very awkward to listen to.
Of course, cross-talk pays attention to the point of opening the spring, Qiu Yingjun Yu Dan is at the scene of the intangible cultural heritage cross-talk conference, most of the audience under the stage are cross-talk old audiences and cross-talk enthusiasts, so that the traditional life of course to pursue the rules and porcelain.
Guo Degang Yuqian's performance occasion should be a commercial performance or cross-talk special of Deyun Society, most of the audience below are Deyun girls (judging from screaming and coaxing sounds), they may be relatively more fond of listening to some thin-skinned stuffing and low-level interesting things, if Lao Guo is like Qiu Yingjun, the scene effect may not be too good.
As Professor Wang Defeng of Fudan University said: Low-level interesting things will also make me laugh, sometimes and farts and meat strips are obviously more effective in funny.
The author believes that if the two cross-talk are scored by the 100-point system from the perspective of cross-talk, Qiu Yingjun Yudan's version of "Stealing axes" can at least get more than 80 points. If Hou Yaowen is allowed to rate Guo Degang Yuqian's version of "Stealing axes", it is good to score 20 points, and if Zhao Peiru is allowed to score, it is estimated that it is a reward for two ear scrapers plus a penalty of kneeling for two hours.
However, this does not mean that Guo Degang Yuqian's approach is not right, or that sentence, crosstalk to point out the spring, not that they can not say the level of Qiu Yingjun Yu Dan, but they chose to take this low-level fun route in order to cater to the preferences of the audience, and said a traditional cross-talk to pieces.
To put it bluntly, Guo Degang Yuqian's version of "Stealing axes" is the result of the money bag deciding the head, making money, not chilling.
Third, who does not understand crosstalk
The author once picked out a clip of Qiu Yingjun's Dan version of "Stealing axes" and put it on the Internet to share, that is, the paragraph "the negation of negation is affirmation (except for Beijingers)" in the pad words, but in the comment area, I found that many viewers thought that the cross-talk between the two of them was not interesting, or even called cross-talk, because it was not funny.
On the contrary, there are many people on the Internet who believe that Guo Degang's statement is the real cross-talk, and the two of them are the representatives of traditional cross-talk.
This is a strange question.
The strange thing is that many viewers who pay attention to the cross-talk industry now do not understand cross-talk at all.
The real traditional cross-talk is actually the same as Qiu Yingjun Yudan's version of "Stealing axes", and the focus of its creation and performance is to describe cross-talk as a "toy", which means that it can be enjoyed many times, and its effect is not necessarily "landslide crack", but its content arrangement is very delicate and very up to the touch.
For example, the Beijinger said "negation of negation or negation", the material comes from life, think about it carefully, it is really so, usually you may pay attention to it, and then you can tell friends, colleagues and children as jokes or life experience. This is the charm of traditional crosstalk, which can be passed down for hundreds of years.
Typical works such as Hou Baolin's "Empty City Plan", "Three Stick Drums", Guo Rongqi's "Theory of Playing Cards" and other works, the author has listened to dozens of times, and I still like to listen to it every once in a while. This is the same as some classic songs that have been sung for decades and classic film and television dramas that have been watched countless times.
Guo Degang Yuqian's version of "Stealing axes" belongs to the typical fast food style, but also the kind of cheap fast food that is not high in style, once you listen to it, you can't leave it, there is no logic inside the paragraph, almost every performance is different, not only can not be passed on, but you can not tell colleagues, friends and children about this cross-talk, after all, we still have to pay attention to personal image and influence in daily life and work.
Guo Degang Yuqian's version of Stealing axes should not be called crosstalk strictly speaking, but borrowed the title of Stealing Axes, barely retained more than 3 minutes of positive life in 29 minutes, and then mixed the Yu Qian family, network strips and pee farts together to form a joke collection.
Therefore, some viewers like Guo Degang's works in the style of cheap fast food in Qian, of course, there is no problem, And Young Master Wang still eats street stalls, but if you say that the collection of funny passages in this cheap fast food style is real crosstalk, it also represents traditional crosstalk, and also shows the tomb of the ancestors of crosstalk, then it is really that you don't understand crosstalk.
Qiu Yingjun Yu Dan's version of "Stealing axes" is the original appearance of traditional cross-talk, if you think that the work is not funny and not cross-talk, it can only prove that you are still a lot away from a real cross-talk audience, and what you like is not cross-talk.
Qiu Yingjun Yu Dan's version of "Stealing axes" is the original appearance of traditional cross-talk, if you think that the work is not funny and not cross-talk, it can only prove that you are still a lot away from a real cross-talk audience, and the things you like are probably not cross-talk.