After so long in World War II, Germany has always held a relatively cold or evasive attitude on the issue of original sin such as war, Hitler, and Jews, but I did not expect that this time, the Germans themselves wrote this novel and put it on the big screen, and this sensitive person not only admired their courage, but more importantly, brought out some modern problems, which caused people to think deeply.
Synopsis:
The Nazi Fuehrer Hitler, who committed suicide in 1945, did not die! He woke up in Berlin, Germany, after 70 years of slumber, but he - found that today's Germany is no longer what he knows, the war is over, his dictatorship is no longer there, he walks the streets in ignorance- but because he "looks too much like" Hitler, he is photographed on television and becomes a comedy star, popular throughout the country and becomes a media darling, he thinks that the developed Internet media can become the best weapon for him to give orders and Buda ideas, and in the twenty-first century, he still tries to manipulate the world.
---------------------------- the following small thunder, be careful to step on---------------------------
The film cleverly uses the "Hitler effect" to bring to the controversial topics of the past and the present, from Jews to the present young people are low-paid, talking about everything, using a fictional crossing to explore this world that is still full of problems, although it is applicable to many teasing ways to look at it, but it is full of irony, when only Hitler himself is very serious about himself, looking at the current situation and interacting with it, others are hypocritical and exaggerated.
And this movie, in addition to using the influence of Hitler to point out the problem, more important is the rookie director and his lover, the strong woman president and the jealous bald vice president, these four characters in the plot of the ups and downs, but also represent the representatives of the society under the framework of various different faces--- positive and negative civilians and positive and negative leaders, for this series of "Hitler effect", there are various views and attachment effects, deliberately watch jokes, use him to earn huge profits, achieve their dreams, etc. Which one is not the same as the fiery following of the 1933 reaction? Even after 70 years of changes in the space-time environment, this phenomenon does not seem to disappear in Germany.
In this movie, there are still some doubts and fears about Hitler, whether it is being beaten to the head, the Jewish old man is mad on the spot, or to those who repeatedly ask him his name in one post, Hitler still responds with a self-preservation attitude, showing a high degree of tolerance and omniscience, and cannot see any modern maladies, perhaps the film is more paradoxical.
For those who know Hitler very well, watching this film will definitely see many unexpected laughs, and at the same time, the imitation and spoof of the god work "The Destruction of the Empire" has also been mocked, but it does not make the whole movie feel very mixed, which is a good grasp.
The interesting thing about this movie is that the application of Hitler's past achievements to the current issue is actually not contrary to the fact that Hitler has had controversies in the past, but it is undeniable that he always knows the core of the problem, and how to respond to the expectations of the people, and says the actual practice and implementation of these ideas, regardless of the correctness and morality, such a character is really very suitable to be a leader, and in the face of controversy and doubt, the courage to bear the past and face the status quo, Is this idea an irony or an incentive for German Germany now?
Finally, the boundary between the fact and the fiction in the later part of the film was made into an illusion of editing techniques, making this seemingly true and false reality more elusive, is it good or bad to let such a reality continue to remain in the current society? Will it be more progressive or will it go back? I think this film has successfully pointed out many conflicts and questions, and all that remains is to let the audience feel free to testify